ext_82219 ([identity profile] shahni.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-05-29 02:43 pm

[ SECRET POST #144 ]


⌈ Secret Post #144 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.




Notes:

- Con returnee is happy and sleepy. Thus you get early post!

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 75 secrets from Secret Submission Post #021.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Wednesday, May 30th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: Here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: 16

[identity profile] lightpipe.livejournal.com 2007-05-29 10:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Hmm, that's not what the rest of the secret made it sound like to me, though.

Re: 16

[identity profile] glitterbats.livejournal.com 2007-05-29 10:39 pm (UTC)(link)
I can understand that. I read it that way at first, until I scrolled down and saw the OP saying that they worded it badly. Plus, I've had people pull the "ageism" card on me a lot when I rejected them from RPs I modded.

Plus, I can kinda understand why someone would be wary of RPers under a certain age. Myself, I can be a little skittish around under-age RPers at first because those are generally the ones who will get upset at me for my character's actions, or if I refuse to play something with them. It isn't fair to the sane under-agers and I know it, but once burnt and all that.