ext_82219 ([identity profile] shahni.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-05-29 02:43 pm

[ SECRET POST #144 ]


⌈ Secret Post #144 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.




Notes:

- Con returnee is happy and sleepy. Thus you get early post!

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 75 secrets from Secret Submission Post #021.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Wednesday, May 30th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: Here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: 16

(Anonymous) 2007-05-29 10:27 pm (UTC)(link)
There's a difference between "don't want in" and "got the mods to kick me out of." I'm wary of <15 year olds in general, mostly because of people like the ones I have to deal with now, but the secret wasn't pointed against 15-year-olds.

The point is, it's not because they're 15 and not because of their writing ability, it's because of their immaturity. I hate when they claim either of the two when it has nothing to do with that. Does it make sense now?

Re: 16

[identity profile] failaga.livejournal.com 2007-05-29 10:45 pm (UTC)(link)
My 2cents: I think the reactions you're getting are simply because you specified an age group. After all, plenty of us are incredibly immature and way over 15.

However, admittedly we may be more aware of the consequences of our actions

- or not. :/

Re: 16

[identity profile] levikitty.livejournal.com 2007-05-29 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)
The problem here is your wording, you don't specifically state the maturity of the individual in question, but it sounds more like you're addressing all 15-year-olds. Which I suppose you are, now that I've read the comments.