(no subject)

[grayout.livejournal.com]

⌈ Secret Post #148 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.




Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 98 secrets from Secret Submission Post #022.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, [ 1 ] not!secrets, 0 not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Sunday, June 3rd, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: Here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Re 6

[ew-younerd.livejournal.com]

I mainly just pulled that up to show something that most scientists know while most psychologists don't know: Studies are not the be-all end all, especially when they are not consistent in conclusive results and do not hold enough control groups or wide demographics. Studies on bisexuality today using the mechanics of measuring genital arousal while the subjects to experiment view erotic images would indicate that there are almost no male bisexuals, period, while female bisexuals exist everywhere.

Of course, I've met real male bisexuals, so that isn't very true.

The fact of the matter is, it's foolish to make any rash generalizations on sexuality, speaking of rigid or fluid terms. This is because we are still discovering the neurochemistry and physiology of romantic love, and how it correlates with attraction and sex. They are controlled in different parts of the brain, and while they are entwined they can also exist exclusively of each other (attraction and romantic attraction). Until more scientific research is done on the subject, one can only speculate, but one should also not project their own views of sexuality on to an entire population.

Re: Re 6

[poisonangel7.livejournal.com]

I would agree with all of that assuming you are not implying I was speaking to the counter. But whether you reply or not, I leave the issue here rather than end up on a wanking site. ^_^ Have a good one.