[ SECRET POST #1535 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #1535 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________



21.


__________________________________________________



22.


__________________________________________________



23.


__________________________________________________



24.


__________________________________________________



25.


__________________________________________________



26.


__________________________________________________



27.


__________________________________________________



28.


__________________________________________________



29.


__________________________________________________



30.


__________________________________________________



31.


__________________________________________________



32.


__________________________________________________



33.


__________________________________________________



34.


__________________________________________________



35.


__________________________________________________



36.


__________________________________________________



37.


__________________________________________________



38.


__________________________________________________



39.


__________________________________________________



40.


__________________________________________________



41.


__________________________________________________



42.


__________________________________________________



43.


__________________________________________________



44.


__________________________________________________



45.


__________________________________________________



46.


__________________________________________________



47.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #219.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[kallanda-lee.livejournal.com]

Only, the Bechdel test doesn't test for developed female characters. If there are two women who talk about buying shoes or changing nappies, it would still pass the test, and I do not find that particularly empowering...

[gabzillaz.livejournal.com]

The tone of the secret implies the OP doesn't really care about strong of well developed female characters.

And what exactly is wrong with buying shoes and changing nappies? If the women in question like to do that, I don't see anything wrong with it.

[kallanda-lee.livejournal.com]

In that case there's nothing wrong with talking about men either, because a lot of women like talking about men.

There's nothing wrong about talking about nappies or shoes ( wait, there are people who LIKE talking about nappies? ), but is does reinforce certain clichés (women want to buy stuff, women are interested in babies). So excuse me if I do not find those particular conversations thrilling to see, either. Just because they're talking about something other then men, doesn't make them interesting, or a strong character.
So I'm basically stating that the test doesn't actually prove much. Except that there were two women in it, who talked, but not about men. Which really doesn't say much at all.

I see the secret differently, because of all the fandoms to pick this battle over, I really don't think Sherlock should be the one.It really IS about Holmes and Watson, who, you know, are men. I do not see the added value of having two female side-characters interacting extensively...in this particular show.

[gabzillaz.livejournal.com]

There's nothing wrong with it... unless you have a high number of shows and movies were men is the only thing female characters talk about.

The test is not about movies being feminist or even good - heck, SatC passes it -, it's about how so many movies follow the same pattern. The OP implied that she didn't care about female characters getting development either. Which is fine. But complaining about people who do care? Eh, yeah...

I don't watch the show but I read the books. And I always wanted more female characters. And I'm sure others do. Just because the main charactes are male, doesn't mean you can't have interesting SECONDARY female characters.