Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2011-10-22 03:55 pm
[ SECRET POST #1754 ]
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.

__________________________________________________
23.

__________________________________________________
24.

__________________________________________________
25.

__________________________________________________
26.

__________________________________________________
27.

__________________________________________________
28.

__________________________________________________
29.

__________________________________________________
30.

__________________________________________________
31.

__________________________________________________
32.

__________________________________________________
33.

__________________________________________________
34.

__________________________________________________
35.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 10 pages, 248 secrets from Secret Submission Post #251.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 3 - too big ], [ 0 - hit/ship/spiration ], [ 0 - omgiknowthem ], [ 0 - take it to comments ], [ 1 - repeats ]
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-10-22 09:40 pm (UTC)(link)Is it so hard to write a normal woman with a defined personality and a balanced amount of flaws and qualities? I'm trying not to generalize, plenty of shows have great, well written females but I keep running in walking stereotypes and this upsets me a little.
no subject
That being said, if the character is going to be wrong-footed somehow, it needs to make sense. The rookie cop fresh out of the Academy throwing up at a crime scene and seriously questioning her fitness to be a cop? Acceptable. A fresh-out-of-the-Academy agent being inducted into an elite unit previously established to have a waiting list a mile long and THEN being a newb everywhere? Not realistic, needs to go. The CMO of a top-secret best-of-the-best-of-the-best-sir mission going into a tithery indecision on 7/10 missions and needed to be rescued on all ten (and still somehow being allowed to stay) and then commits three major ethics violations that are NOT of the black-ops variety? HATE.
DragonLady
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-10-23 12:41 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Criminal Minds does the best job with making non-badass females appealing. The victims are just regular women in horrid circumstances, some of them freeze or cry or panic or try to escape and fail, but you're still sorry when they get offed or are happy when they're rescued. And then a victim comes along and pulls it together better than even she thought she could, and completely wows you, just to prove that the show is as far from glorifying female victimization as possible. ♥
DragonLady
no subject
(and funny how some people complain about "super-smart" women but not super-smart men *cough*Sherlock*cough*)
no subject
Whereas, most of the time when I've seen them at least, super-smart female characters are defined by that one trait--their ~super-smart-ness~--maybe with the addition of also being ~fashionable~ or ~dorky~ or some other stock descriptor. They're stereotypes and not characters.
Ugh I could go on about this all day, but basically what I'm trying to say is: a lot of people suck at writing female characters that are anywhere near as developed as their male characters. And it sucks.