case: ([ Devilbats; Fandom sucks. ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-07-03 06:07 pm

[ SECRET POST #179 ]


⌈ Secret Post #179 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 82 secrets from Secret Submission Post #026.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 ] broken links, [ 1 2 ] not!secrets, [ 1 ] not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Wednesday, July 4th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: Here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: 25

[identity profile] mcjunyi.livejournal.com 2007-07-04 11:28 am (UTC)(link)
This is a recomment because I really need to learn to word things better! So, fix'd!

And CFUD side represent?

I'm a little hesitant to say that one side or the other (Crack or serious) requires more or less effort than the other. If you take a look at CFUD, which is supposed to be crack, we have a lot of serious roleplay going on because, hey, it's hard to be funny all the time. Or hard to try to be funny. Sometimes I think serious RPs have it easier because it's still okay to constantly bring the funny, and as long as you're still within the scope of the game, that's great! But in a crack RP, if you constantly get too serious and emo, people will start to get on you for it. Granted, CFUD's gotten a lot more accepting of serious plots over time, but the focus is still supposed to be about humor.

Anyway, the point I'm trying to make is that I don't really think that crack automatically makes things easy. Sure, you can throw a lot of stuff (like, uh, reality) out the window in the name of hilarity, but at the same time, depending on who you play, it can be a lot more difficult to keep them in character when having them this far out of their element. And I really enjoy that challenge.

And in the end, it's all about having fun anyway, right?