case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-01-28 03:06 pm

[ SECRET POST #1852 ]

⌈ Secret Post #1852 ⌋


Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________

02.


__________________________________________________

03.


__________________________________________________

04.


__________________________________________________

05.


__________________________________________________

06.


__________________________________________________

07.


__________________________________________________

08.


__________________________________________________

09.


__________________________________________________

10.


__________________________________________________

11.


__________________________________________________

12.


__________________________________________________

13.


__________________________________________________

14.


__________________________________________________

15.


__________________________________________________

16.


__________________________________________________

17.


__________________________________________________

18.


__________________________________________________

19.


__________________________________________________

20.


__________________________________________________

21.


__________________________________________________

22.


__________________________________________________

23.


__________________________________________________

24.


__________________________________________________

25.


__________________________________________________

26.


__________________________________________________

27.


__________________________________________________

28.


__________________________________________________

29.


__________________________________________________

30.


__________________________________________________

31.


__________________________________________________

32.







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 09 pages, 205 secrets from Secret Submission Post #265.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 3 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeats ]
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments and concerns should go here.

[identity profile] kindlycoyote.livejournal.com 2012-01-29 12:27 am (UTC)(link)
Reading over the case now, I do think that she had likely cause to sue. However, I do dislike the suing culture that assumes the majority of the fault lies with McDonalds in this case (because there are other issues where McDonald's is ridiculous, and where they should be shouldering the blame). The client performed a couple of ill-advised actions herself (balancing the cup between her knees, which is a recipe for disaster in many times I have seen it done by other people and a couple times with myself), and other parts of it are tragedy of the circumstances. It was a terrible accident, and it's not like McDonalds (in this case) was doing anything other than serving coffee at a temperature that most it's clientele desired.

Urgh, defending McDonald's beyond a cheap joke... bleh. Excuse me while I go to wash out my mouth.

But as I said, she did have cause to sue as in her case I doubt she had the money to pay for those bills, and McDonald's should have offered her more right off the bat as they were partially at fault.

Of course, this is all from a moral discussion and less from a law one, as I'm not a lawyer or even a law student.

And, with all that said... I am kinda amused that you feel the need to accompany every post with a rude tone when I have yet to do the same to you. There is no need for being brash, especially when it comes to cultural situations like that it is rare that a person would know the extent of the lady's injuries. Heck, I think I was under ten when that case was passed. Heard the jokes, didn't even know it was a lady who sued or what their age was or what degree the burns were.

(Anonymous) 2012-01-29 12:30 am (UTC)(link)
Are you blaming the victim of burns for her own burns? What the fuck is wrong with you?


And, with all that said... I am kinda amused that you feel the need to accompany every post with a rude tone when I have yet to do the same to you.


I'm not the only person in anon talking to you.

Heck, I think I was under ten when that case was passed. Heard the jokes, didn't even know it was a lady who sued or what their age was or what degree the burns were.

People like you contribute to problems in society. How about you educate yourself before spewing bullshit?

(Anonymous) 2012-01-29 03:40 am (UTC)(link)
She didn't get the seriousness of the case, anon, she didn't make the joke out of any malicious intent and she already apologized for what came off as a callous comment. You need to relax.

[identity profile] kikkyo.livejournal.com 2012-01-29 04:46 pm (UTC)(link)
This, and it's pretty obvious she went back and researched into it too. So that bit about her needing to educate herself is pointless.

(Anonymous) 2012-01-29 05:39 am (UTC)(link)
Are you blaming the victim of burns for her own burns? What the fuck is wrong with you?

So I take a hot cup of coffee, balance it in my lap, and it spills, and in your opinion that somehow makes it the fault of the people who sold me the coffee? No, that's the fault of my own damn stupidity in putting the coffee there in the first place.

I feel for the woman and the severity of the injuries was clearly horrible but it was in no way anyone's fault but her own.

(Anonymous) 2012-01-29 04:48 pm (UTC)(link)
This!

(Anonymous) 2012-01-30 05:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Except if she had consumed the coffee normally those burns would be on the inside of her mouth.

Considering it melted her labia, I shudder to think what it would do to her tongue and throat
herongale: (Default)

[personal profile] herongale 2012-01-29 05:22 am (UTC)(link)
Wrong. I heard a story on NPR about the McDonalds coffee case some time back, and what you need to know is that McDonalds was serving their coffee at an excessively high temperature and had been receiving complaints about this for a while, and did nothing.

One of the reasons that case resulted in such a punitive payout is because there was a pattern of negligent behavior on the part of McDonalds. It wasn't just some one-off incident where no one else cared or suffered harms.

(Anonymous) 2012-01-30 05:40 am (UTC)(link)
Dude, their coffee was so hot that if she had drank it, like one does with coffee, she would have gotten burns on the inside of her mouth that would be horrible.

And Mcdonalds was well aware their coffee was dangerusly hot, employees who had been injured because of it had brought it to their attention many times