case: ([ Gin; Tragedy. ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-07-07 05:31 pm

[ SECRET POST #183 ]


⌈ Secret Post #183 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.



Notes:

Might have taken one from the recent submission post. Sorry about that!

PS - I hate HTML

Secrets Left to Post: 07 pages, 164 secrets from Secret Submission Post #026.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, 0 not!secrets, [ 1 ] not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Sunday, July 8th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[identity profile] imrihamun.livejournal.com 2007-07-08 02:52 am (UTC)(link)
I agree. Fewer people are real asexuals (just like fewer are Aspergersy) in the real world. So you're not interested in the modern, western, hypersexualized culture? Fine. Our [popular] culture puts waaay too much emphasis on it, to which I agree. But you wouldn't be calling yourself asexual outside of our culture. I find it to be a stupid, culture-bound label, often used by people who still do get off, at least somewhat, on smutfic, but don't have real life experience. I haven't seen many people who don't like romance fic, not as much as I've seen that kind, but the same thing - I mean, you don't like a certain, relatively large genre of fic, that's fine, but don't give your presumed sexual preference as a reason.

Besides, defining sexual preference is crap. It implies that it is static. It ain't fuckin' static.