[ SECRET POST #1891 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #1891 ⌋


Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________

02.


__________________________________________________

03.


__________________________________________________

04.


__________________________________________________

05.


__________________________________________________

06.


__________________________________________________

07.


__________________________________________________

08.


__________________________________________________

09.


__________________________________________________

10.


__________________________________________________

11.


__________________________________________________

12.


__________________________________________________

13.


__________________________________________________

14.


__________________________________________________

15.


__________________________________________________

16.


__________________________________________________

17.


__________________________________________________

18.


__________________________________________________

19.


__________________________________________________

20.


__________________________________________________

21.


__________________________________________________

22.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 81 secrets from Secret Submission Post #270.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 3 4 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeats ]
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments and concerns should go here.

Comments

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

Non-sexual is not asexual, omg.

People who aren't sexuals (i.e, who do not have normative sex drives and feelings of sexual attraction) are NON-sexuals. It doesn't mean they don't experience sexual attraction like asexuals, just that they're are not included in the privileged group 'sexuals' because they diverge from that norm. Asexuals are non-sexuals. Demisexuals are non-sexuals. Hypersexuals are non-sexuals. It doesn't mean they don't experience sexual attraction, just that they aren't sexuals. Get it?

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

I get that you're an appropriative dick, yes.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

NA

It's their identity, asshole. Lay off. How does it hurt you for them to identify as they wish? You're making yourself look like those jerks that think asexuals shouldn't be considered queer.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

DA

I'm asexual, and IA with AYRT. How is having a catch-all term to refer to all people who fall outside of the sexual norm a bad thing? IDG how that's appropriative.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

That term, if it includes hypersexuals, shouldn't be asexual.

Non-sexually-normative perhaps.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

But the term isn't asexual, it's non-sexual.

And non-sexually-normative is a mouthful, TBH.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

NSN then.

We can confuse the normative-sexuals with it :D

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

oh for fuck's sake DO SOME RESEARCH ON ASEXUAL HISTORY BEFORE YOU SPOUT SHIT YOU DON'T KNOW ABOUT

jesus fuck