Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-03-08 06:53 pm
[ SECRET POST #1892 ]
⌈ Secret Post #1892 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[How I Met Your Mother]
__________________________________________________
03.

[White Collar]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Smash]
__________________________________________________
05.

[How I Met Your Mother]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Revenge]
__________________________________________________
07.

[The Hunger Games]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Yu-Gi-Oh]
__________________________________________________
09.

[White Collar]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Obscurus Lupa, Subspecies]
__________________________________________________
11.

[Castleville]
__________________________________________________
12.

[Gintama]
__________________________________________________
13.

[The Cat Returns]
__________________________________________________
14.

[Mythbusters]
__________________________________________________
15.

[Invasion of the Body Snatchers]
__________________________________________________
16.

[Titanic]
__________________________________________________
17.

[All Dogs go to Heaven]
__________________________________________________
18.

[Hatoful Boyfriend]
__________________________________________________
19.

[Pokemon]
__________________________________________________
20.
[Phantom of the Opera]
__________________________________________________
21.

[The Middle]
__________________________________________________
22.

[life on mars]
__________________________________________________
23.

[Scrubs]
__________________________________________________
24.

[A Goofy Movie]
__________________________________________________
25.

[Nerimon/Alex Day]
__________________________________________________
26.

[Katie McGrath]
__________________________________________________
27.

[Chuck]
__________________________________________________
28.

[Top Chef Season 9]
__________________________________________________
29.

[The Vampire Diaries]
__________________________________________________
30.

[The Vampire Diaries]
__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 045 secrets from Secret Submission Post #270.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(frozen comment) no subject
(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-09 05:48 am (UTC)(link)That's what this comes down to and that's what the problem is with the line of thinking that all of a woman's choices need to be questioned. Whenever that choice doesn't line up with what you (general you here) think, that means she's obviously not questioning it enough and is influenced by society. The only way to be considered to have questioned yourself enough is to fall into line with the 'right' way of thinking.
(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-09 06:34 am (UTC)(link)Wow. Sorry, but speaking as a guy, that is horrible. You're unfairly putting most of the onus of questioning choices on women, and demeaning them for it if they don't go along with you, while if a guy were to make those same choices and not listen to you, you'd barely give them a meh.
It's sexist.
(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-09 06:37 am (UTC)(link)Stopped reading right there. Kindly shut your hole, please.
(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-09 06:40 am (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-09 06:48 am (UTC)(link)Speaking as a woman, I agree with him. Unless you can judge an argument based off something other than sex of the speaker, kindly shut your hole.
(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-09 06:51 am (UTC)(link)Here here!
He may not have the personal experience like women do, but if the points are valid, they're valid no matter who says them.
(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-09 06:59 am (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-09 07:08 am (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-09 03:59 pm (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-09 05:09 pm (UTC)(link)And essentially you're telling him to shut up and eat his privilege cake instead of questioning why it's on his plate and why it is being put there by a feminist, of all people.
:\
(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-09 05:14 pm (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-09 05:41 pm (UTC)(link)Okay, so it's not so much that there's not an original cake on his plate given to him by the benefit of being male in our society, it's that she purposely went over and put a big dollop of whipped cream and a sparkler candle on it to boot when he never asked for it and there are women across the restaurant trying to flag her down for the check and getting quite angry that they're being ignored.
Should he just have sat there and eaten the whole thing despite his lactose intolerance to the system he'd be perpetuating by not questioning the unfairness of the circumstances? Even if it's to say something like 'oh, hey, I think those ladies would really appreciate a check'?
(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-09 05:48 pm (UTC)(link)What men need to do is throw the cake out, but also sit down and shut the fuck up for once.
(frozen comment) (no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-03-09 17:59 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) (no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-03-09 18:15 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-09 05:35 pm (UTC)(link)Dehumanizing one group by gender is not the way to combat dehumanizing other people by gender.
You're not sticking it to the patriarchy, you're just being an asshole.
If you're a woman who thinks you're such a special little snowflake and not like all those other women so much that patriarchal society hasn't had any influence at all on what you want, then I think you're naive and a bit of an idiot.
No, I think most women have been influenced a bit by patriarchal society, but this doesn't mean their not individuals capable of making their own choices nor does it mean that many women have rejected what the patriarchy says (in varying amounts) in order to live the life they want to. You seem to have far less faith in women than I do.
(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-09 06:55 pm (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-09 07:03 pm (UTC)(link)I'm convinced the only way we'll ever be equal is if we're all dehumanized equally.
But that was what the male anon above was trying to say?
(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-09 07:23 pm (UTC)(link)Thank you for proving that women can be far more misogynist than men. Gold star!
It's far more subtle than you can possibly comprehend, and it works.
Wow, how freaking condescending can you be? I guess I just shouldn't worry my pretty little head over it! There's no way a little simpleton like me could possibly understand the grand things you do! That's it, no woman should be able to look at advertising because it might sway her weak will. Does this mean you're actively promoting patriarchal ideals? Did you really consider your choice to manipulate women into doing what the patriarchy wants?
Also, if advertising so complex, surely medicine must be just as complex. Does that mean I should just sign away my body to whatever doctors say?
I guess us women are just too dumb to make our own choices.
(frozen comment) (no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-03-09 19:31 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) (no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-03-09 19:42 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) (no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-03-09 19:43 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) (no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-03-09 19:47 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) (no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-03-09 19:56 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) (no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-03-09 20:07 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) (no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-03-09 20:09 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-09 04:18 pm (UTC)(link)Oh I know, because trans-men are not ~real men, amirtite.
(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-09 04:27 pm (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-09 05:22 pm (UTC)(link)As a pre-op, pre-T transman, I don't give a shit if I haven't benefited from male privilege yet. Please treat me like a cisman online, the only place I pass in, and stop singling me out for special treatment, even if its to tell me to fuck myself.
For christ's sake, we just did this last week.
(frozen comment) no subject
Especially considering by your own declarations that we're the half running it all. We do happen to be involved in, you know, every issue being talked of on here.
Or do you just want to have a turn at marginalizing somebody? Oh noes! I'm going to piss you off now by pointing out that your willingness to dismiss somebody's opinion based on their gender means you'd have made a great status quo maintaining man.
(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-09 03:53 pm (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) no subject
If that's the case however, you probably shouldn't put a discussion up in a place where there's so many of us dudes. Most people, upon seeing a discussion that interests them, will want to get involved. Being told they can't play cause of gender, is, well... you probably can finish that thought for me. Let's face it, Fandom!Secrets really isn't a girls club.
I suppose in part it depends on the goal of the discussion, but it seems to me that the guy that was original posted to made a valid point. Agree with that point or don't, the argument of "you're male, you can't talk about this" is, well, pretty damn flawed. Simply from a debate standpoint the lack of acknowledgement of the point by devolving into personal attacks is on par with all the dismissive attacks folks would cite on here as bigoted, sexist or ablest. The context of oppression doesn't change the fact that it's a shit argument, turning it around just proves that all groups have assholes.
It'd be one thing to tell a guy that no, sexism has not affected him in the same way or the same magnitude as it has affected women, which from what I've seen is the point encompassing or behind many of the situations where it becomes "All about him." In this case however, a guy pointed out (and I agree with him, though I think my argument itself is neutral here) that the poster above him was unfairly putting women's decisions under a ridiculously fine level of scrutiny that seems to require every decision to be judged against if it's that person's desires or if it's society's, whereas men apparently shouldn't do that just because they haven't been devalued to the same degree (Isn't this that society the poster has all the problems with that they want to change)? Especially considering the conversation suggests that any girl who goes with society's expectations must be it's slave, I think the point can be acknowledged, a position argued, clarified, or rejected. Otherwise, you'll have even those on your side turn from your inadequate tactics.
TL;DR This isn't a girls only board. Guys are here. Guys might have something to say. And if their argument isn't crap, a crap dismissal means the crappy one is you.
(frozen comment) no subject