Case (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
case) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
fandomsecrets2012-03-12 07:13 pm
case) wrote in fandomsecrets2012-03-12 07:13 pm
[ SECRET POST #1896 ]
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.
__________________________________________________
02.
__________________________________________________
03.
__________________________________________________
04.
__________________________________________________
05.
__________________________________________________
06.
__________________________________________________
07.
__________________________________________________
08.
__________________________________________________
09.
__________________________________________________
10.
__________________________________________________
11.
__________________________________________________
12.
__________________________________________________
13.
__________________________________________________
14.
__________________________________________________
15.
__________________________________________________
16.
__________________________________________________
17.
__________________________________________________
18.
__________________________________________________
19.
__________________________________________________
20.
__________________________________________________
21.
__________________________________________________
22.
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 115 secrets from Secret Submission Post #271.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeats ]
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments and concerns should go here.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-13 12:01 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-13 02:10 am (UTC)(link)It's not to say that Dickens was always spot-on with his morals (his treatment of women, and especially women's suffragists, was consistently either overly-idealized or condescending), but he was a vehement opponent of Parliament's and English society's cruel mistreatment of the poor, and strongly criticized the continuing practice of slavery in the United States. He was also, to my knowledge, one of the few Victorian anti-semitical authors who realized the wrongness of his views and tried to make amends for them. (There's an entire subplot in Our Mutual Friend that revolves around a Mr. Riah, who was a response to Dickens' earlier character of Fagin.)
George Orwell was right when he noted that Dickens railed against cruelty without providing solutions to end it, but I don't think that would qualify Dickens as a "total douche."
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-13 02:36 pm (UTC)(link)