[ SECRET POST #1896 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #1896 ⌋


Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________

02.


__________________________________________________

03.


__________________________________________________

04.


__________________________________________________

05.


__________________________________________________

06.


__________________________________________________

07.


__________________________________________________

08.


__________________________________________________

09.


__________________________________________________

10.


__________________________________________________

11.


__________________________________________________

12.


__________________________________________________

13.


__________________________________________________

14.


__________________________________________________

15.


__________________________________________________

16.


__________________________________________________

17.


__________________________________________________

18.


__________________________________________________

19.


__________________________________________________

20.


__________________________________________________

21.


__________________________________________________

22.






Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 115 secrets from Secret Submission Post #271.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeats ]
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments and concerns should go here.

Comments

[marshwiggledyke.livejournal.com]

I thought dyadic was to intersex what cis is to trans?

*confused, has never heard it mentioned in relation to poly folks*

[omorka.livejournal.com]

Huh, interesting. It just means "pair" in non-jargon English, and my local poly group uses it to refer to a couple-type relationship - closed dyad, open dyad, etc., as opposed to triad, V, or quad. Sometimes we use it to refer to each one-on-one pair relationship in a larger intimate network-type relationship. Anthony Ravenscroft uses it in his book, too, so I guess I thought it wasn't just a local usage - and I've never head our local intersex activist in the poly group use it in reference to intersex issues!

Google says both jargon meanings are live usage. The more you know!