Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2007-07-10 03:46 pm
[ SECRET POST #186 ]
⌈ Secret Post #186 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

Notes:
Early-early 'cause I've got stuff to do later. ):
Secrets Left to Post: 07 pages, 164 secrets from Secret Submission Post #027.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 ] broken links, [ 1 ] not!secrets, [ 1 ] not!fandom, [ 1 ] personal attack.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Wednesday, July 11th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
Eh, I can, especially if they're the sort to enjoy more simplistic art or very masculine men. And I can understand that; There are things that I get hair-triggery about too (for example, if it even looks like someone's getting dog-piled over a difference of opinion.)
no subject
Art Secret Poster Doesn't Personally Happen To Like ≠ Bad Art.
To give a personal example, I don't much care for Tolkein's prose. I wouldn't claim it was bad prose just because it didn't do anything for me. It's not bad prose and The Lord of the Rings is not a bad book just because I personally didn't get on with it. By the same token, I cannot believe anyone with eyes in their head could call Kaori Yuki a bad artist. I can, much as I love her work, understand that her art style isn't going to do it for everybody - but to claim she's a bad artist is frankly ridiculous when she is very obviously nothing of the sort.
And anyone who gets their ideas on Victorian society from Count Cain needs to borrow a clue. No, it's not an accurate portrayal of life in Victorian London, but that's because it's a Gothic fantasy and is therefore not even trying to be a realistic portrayal of Victorian society. What next, slamming Angel Sanctuary because it doesn't accurately reflect the Christian faith?