[ SECRET POST #1925 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #1925 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________



21.


__________________________________________________



22.


__________________________________________________







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 070 secrets from Secret Submission Post #275.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat (same text, different image) ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

(frozen comment)

[megalomaniageek.livejournal.com]

once they offered it up, it became your money to do with as you please

Legally, yes, but I don't think so socially. The circumstances behind the deceit are socially defensible, yes, but I can't go along with the argument that if you explicitly raise money via donations for a thing then it's perfectly okay to use it for something else.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

Nope, not legally. It was fraud. OP had no intention to by the computer part in the first place.

(frozen comment)

[megalomaniageek.livejournal.com]

I stand corrected. I was under the impression that in an informal giving situation like this the money would be for whatever OP chose to use it for, but yeah, expressing an explicit intention for the donation and then doing something else sounds an awful lot like fraud.

I still think what the OP did was not so horrendous, but that argument about "well besides who cares once the money is in their possession it's theirs to do as they like" just seems hollow.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

It doesn't say the OP actively solicited money, simply that she told people she needed money and they offered it to her. It's the difference between me saying "I wish I had a sandwich" and you offer me the money for one and me saying 'Give me the money for a sandwich"