case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-05-05 04:27 pm

[ SECRET POST #1950 ]


⌈ Secret Post #1950 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 122 secrets from Secret Submission Post #279.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 2 - repeat ], [ 2 - spambots ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2012-05-05 09:59 pm (UTC)(link)
What if the "honest review" they give is 100% stupid? Why do you assume that every piece of concrit would improve the piece it's about?

I've gotten things like "I don't think this character should be gay. Here are tl;dr reasons why." or "I think you should change the whole point of the piece." or "You should add romance. It would be better with romance." - All without me asking for crit, by the way.

That kind of stuff doesn't deserve to be told off, just because it's "honest crit" from the reader who happens to be homophobic or missing the theme or just interested in romance?

[identity profile] silverau.livejournal.com 2012-05-06 01:21 am (UTC)(link)
Because that's different from actual concrit?

(Anonymous) 2012-05-06 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
They didn't say concrit. They said honest review.