Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-05-13 03:49 pm
[ SECRET POST #1958 ]
⌈ Secret Post #1958 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 104 secrets from Secret Submission Post #280.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
Okay, sure.
Tell me, PLEASE tell me, who am I oppressing by being anti-bigotry? Who am I doing serious harm to? Whose rights am I denying? What LAWS am I advocating that would cause serious harm to people by being against bigotry? Please, I am just DYING to know.
You'd be fucking hilarious if your false equivalence didn't make me so damn sad for the world.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-05-15 02:34 am (UTC)(link)Maybe someday you will see this, but I honestly have very little hope that you will. You've become addicted to outrage, and it's harder to kick that habit than it is to stop smoking crack.
no subject
As for my brief discussion here with my friend, I'll thank you not to assume you're getting the full story just from what's here. Not least because I seemed to ignore or breeze over several things because we've had this exact same debate before and I had already talked to them about those things. And I fail to see where I was emotionally manipulative or cruel.
And yeah, I'm basically blowing you off because I tend to pay little or no attention to the kinds of assholes who barge in and decide that my being angry at misogyny is the exact same thing as the right trying to deny me the right to marry.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-05-15 03:04 am (UTC)(link)You're over-the-top. Someone using a word you don't like in anger doesn't necessarily make them a misogynist. Maybe a bit of an ass, but misogyny is a very, very specific word that loses meaning when you toss it out any time someone says "twat" or "bitch."
no subject
As to that, I have calmed down considerably on the language issue. I do still feel that those words are misogynist, though. And I don't consider it a bad thing to call them what they are.
And brony culture, as it were, IS misogynist. The word is -- "brony" is a men-only subfandom/subculture group that purposely excludes women. They also browbeat, threaten, insult, hurl slurs at, etc. woman fans if they dare to think they have a space in the fandom. Further, they act as if because they are men, their opinions, feelings, and fandom of the show are more valid and more important than those of the female fans the show was made for (particularly, I've seen bronies en masse throw fits over the fact that MLP toys are made with - gasp! - little girls in mind, not grown men). They essentially seek to co-opt a show that was made for women and girls because they are men and have decided that space should be theirs, and that is misogynistic.
Misogyny is a word that should be used whenever misogyny occurs or is present. It doesn't "lose its meaning" because we use it to address even more subtle, culturally-validated forms of misogyny like sexist language (bitch, etc.), magazine covers, or subcultural groups where misogyny is normalized and enabled (bronies, the Republican party, etc.).
no subject
And I'll promise you this, too: if one day you find another battle plan in the crusade, I would no sooner bring up your old methods than I would bring up my birth name. 'Cause that's not who we are anymore, and there's nothing wrong with that.
no subject