Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-05-14 06:50 pm
[ SECRET POST #1959 ]
⌈ Secret Post #1959 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15. [repeat]
__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 085 secrets from Secret Submission Post #280.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-05-14 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-05-14 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-05-14 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-05-14 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)I do know the blood panel for these genes is supposed to be very accurate. But of course that's not exactly what you're talking about. Sorry I can't be of help.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-05-14 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)I know of the blood disease. Friend of mine recently got tested. I wish you all the best with your test!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-05-15 12:32 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-05-15 01:44 am (UTC)(link)And thank you! I wish you all the best as well!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-05-15 01:43 am (UTC)(link)But done properly, those tests are pretty accurate. Not sure how private companies work, but check around that they're legit and hold high standards in their labs.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-05-15 04:31 am (UTC)(link)no subject
If you don't know, I think it's a pretty good (and fun!) idea. The test wasn't that expensive--under 200 dollars, I think?
no subject
I've always heard that if you want to find out anything about your ancestry that the Mormons have a lot of genealogical information on EVERYONE (in fact I've heard from Jewish people that they're basically your best bet for researching maternal ancestry)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-05-15 12:22 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
Most of the records they have tend to be from European church records, and some South American records, though they also had lots of Jewish records.... except that many of those have been removed due to controversy over baptizing people of non-Morman religion who are not direct ancestors of members of the Mormon faith. Ditto some Catholic church records.
Other areas are less well represented. And there's a big difference between scans of original documents (the bestest sources), transcriptions of original documents (good, but not perfect), and the "Ancestry File" and "Family Group Sheets" which I think are both member-submitted but I can't remember and I can't find the definitions anywhere right now. :P So you do need to be careful in looking at the records, just as you'd need to be careful assuming that someone in the 1920 census has to be your ancestor just based on the name and location.
You can look in the indexes online, though, and you can often request microfilms be sent to a local Family History Center. Some public libraries are also able to request these images via inter-library loan. My parents did a lot of this-- my husband searched https://familysearch.org/ to find good leads, then my parents would request the films by calling a Family History Center near them (yay retirement!) and drive up there once they were notified that the films had arrived. They saved copies of the images, and we later were able to check whether the images did have the info we needed and whether it turned out to be the ancestor we needed.
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
ETA: AND her maiden name is different depending on which site I check which is confusing like it's one thing on the grave site I linked to, and that familysearch.org has it listed as a separate name. The names are similar though, so ... it's just so confusing
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-05-15 20:21 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-05-15 01:20 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Hope that helps? :-)
no subject
https://www.23andme.com/ancestry/techniques/ lists four different techniques that can be done, depending on your gender:
"One, Maternal Ancestry, traces your maternal lineage back through time from you to your mother, her mother, and all the way to the mother of all humans. Paternal Ancestry does the same for your paternal* lineage, tracing from you back to the father of all fathers. A third, Ancestry Painting, tells you where in the world each stretch along each of your 22 autosomal pairs is likely to have come from. The last, Global Similarity, assesses your relatedness to 10 regions that include more than 50 populations worldwide, as measured by the similarity of your DNA to people from those groups.
[snip]
* Paternal lineage information can only be obtained from male DNA. A female can learn about her paternal lineage from a male relative who shares that lineage and has been genotyped."
http://africanancestry.com/matriclan.html talks about one of two tests: "The MatriClan Test traces maternal ancestry by analyzing the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) women and men inherit exclusively from their mothers. We use the Hypervariable Segment 1 (HVS1)."
http://africanancestry.com/patriclan.html talks about the male test: "The PatriClan Test traces paternal ancestry by analyzing the Y-chromosome men inherit exclusively from their fathers. We use nine markers including the YAP.
Since only men carry a Y-chromosome, women CANNOT take the PatriClan Test. But luckily, women may trace their paternal lineage by having a male relative with their father’s last name take the test for them.
We find African ancestry for approximately 65% of the paternal lineages we test. The remaining 35% of the lineages we test typically indicate European ancestry. If our tests indicate that you are not of African descent, we will identify your continent of origin."
Both of the above sites have been featured on the PBS series "Finding Your Roots" which is really cool for discovering celebs' genealogical history.
https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/genographic/participate.html allows you to choose either of the two tests if you're a man, and the maternal test if you're a woman: "*Kits that are marked "maternal lineage" receive the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) test to reveal direct maternal ancestry. We test the Hypervariable Region 1 (HVR1: 16001 to 16569) and compares your results to the Cambridge Reference Sequence.
*Kits marked "paternal" receive the Y-chromosome test to reveal direct paternal ancestry. (Males only.) This is a 12-marker test. Additional testing such as a SNP test may be run on a Y-chromosome sample if analysis of the 12 STR values does not conclusively indicate a Haplogroup assignment."
Finally, http://dna.ancestry.com/ purports to have an updated test that looks at more than just the maternal or paternal lines: "Our new AncestryDNA test uses some of the latest DNA autosomal testing technology as a more comprehensive way to find family across all lines in your family tree. So one test covers both sides—maternal and paternal—and is equally effective for both men and women."
I haven't gotten any of these tests, but I think I'd like to at some point.
no subject
IDK I had a friend who did this recently and I asked her about it because I have been wondering about my maternal lineage for like, my whole life and it's difficult to find anything (I keep hitting a dead end at my great-grandmother's mother, I don't even know her maiden name) but she told me it wouldn't help at all for that.
I mean if all it comes back with is something like "European ancestry" I'd just be like DUH, I mean that is not helpful at all
no subject
The Ancestry DNA test is an autosomal test that purports to show you matches to your dna; close matches can reveal people who are 3rd / 4th / 5th cousins, giving you someone who fits into your tree somehow and who may have done research on the same line of people. Of course, they only show you links to ancestry.com people who have taken the test.
The 23 and me Relative Finder https://www.23andme.com/ancestry/relfinder/ uses the autosomal dna and apparently allows people to connect to others with dna matches on their site.
But in either case, if you find a match, there's a *chance* they could be related to the side you're having the most trouble with. On the flip side, they could be related to you on a side you have researched thoroughly, giving you no new info.
no subject
Far as I could tell, they're pretty accurate. But then, we already knew roughly where it was gonna end up, so.
no subject
...The likelihood of us having twins naturally I'm already aware of. (At least I'll never be 'surprised' by that, I suppose.)Other than this, I support researching your heritage anon- my future sister-in-law has been studying this as part of her anthropology degree, and it's really amazing what they've been able to do.
Related, Genghis Khan (http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/12/descendant-of-genghis-khan-sequenced/) really got around (http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/02/0214_030214_genghis.html) and they have the research to prove it (http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/08/1-in-200-men-direct-descendants-of-genghis-khan/).