[ SECRET POST #1967 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #1967 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________






Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #281.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

da

Ew. That sounds awful tbh - having to carefully censor yourself in public at all times. I don't think I'd be able to do it.

Just curious - what do you mean by "sexually deviant"? Someone who isn't straight-and-vanilla? Someone who has lots of sex or deviates from Christian ideals of what sex should be (whatever those ideals are, since not all Christians agree)? Something else?

[(Anonymous)]

Pretty much all of the above. Anything outside monogamous heterosexual missionary within the bounds of marriage. She's got a long-term boyfriend but they're not engaged, and we've had discussions about her fears that her principal'll find some reason to punish or get rid of her if she should accidentally become pregnant.

Also, the only con here locally got its greatest amount of press ever when it hosted a few furry panels years ago. So that's the association the general public has.

[(Anonymous)]

I've lived in two states in the US South and taught in both at the collegiate level, and you are absolutely right about how careful you have to be in public. If you're not conservative, Protestant Christian, straight, and white in the places I've lived, you're already suspect anyways.

[(Anonymous)]

OP: That's been basically my experience, too. Based on my appearance and general behavior, I typically don't code to people as fannish or alternative lifestyle, which is helpful for maintaining privacy as it relates to my job but makes it hard to connect with peers in my age bracket with the same interests.

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

*nods*

I know exactly what you mean. (Especially when some of the colleagues who I had decided to trust, and who spend most of their time role playing a fucking Vampire the Masquerade game for fuck's sake and who should be my peeps) decided to side with the crazy evil boss of tenure denying doom in her decision. I have kinda decided not to make any RL friends anymore. LOL *sigh* It's just too risky.

[otakugal15.livejournal.com]

Hmm....here in my city we have a furry con that pops up every year...(or is that occasionally?), a con that's been here 30+ years, and new anime con.

They also has some of that stigma as well, but not nearly as bad. And I think that's just because my city is pretty much the only "liberal" city in the entire state.

(if anyone got any of that then, hi possible neighbors!!)