case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-05-25 06:48 pm

[ SECRET POST #1970 ]


⌈ Secret Post #1970 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
[Majin Tantei Nōgami Neuro]


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________













[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]










10. [SPOILERS for ASOIAF, Game of Thrones]



__________________________________________________



11. [SPOILERS for Dangan Ronpa]



__________________________________________________



12. [SPOILERS for Hunger Games]



__________________________________________________













[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]










13. [TRIGGER WARNING for gore/body horror]



__________________________________________________



14. [TRIGGER WARNING for self-harm]



__________________________________________________



15. [TRIGGER WARNING for misogyny, rape, racism]



__________________________________________________







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #281.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[identity profile] crowsilike.livejournal.com 2012-05-26 12:12 pm (UTC)(link)
There was a time when slash meant exactly that - non-canon - but IIRC it applied to all types of pairings, and I'm pretty sure was already shifting into it's current meaning when I joined fandom in the late 90's/early 00's.

[identity profile] kryss-labryn.livejournal.com 2012-05-27 12:56 am (UTC)(link)
Preeeetty sure the term originated in the Star Trek TOS fandom back in the Sixties or the Seventies, with K/S. Which means, if so, that from Day One it applied to a M/M pairing. :-)

From my own experience it seems that "ship" refers to any relationship regardless of gender, but that "slash" refers exclusively to M/M or F/F pairings (usually the former, it seems, the moreso since we also have "femmeslash" to differentiate the two).

I know I first came across the term "slash" referring to a M/M pairing (in my case K/S) back in the early Eighties so it's been around for a long time, although originally it may hae referred to K/S exclusively.

[identity profile] crowsilike.livejournal.com 2012-05-27 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Doh, so it did! I'm not sure how I managed to forget that. Thanks for correcting me!

I can almost swear I've seen discussions about slash being used for non-canon pairings. Though now that I think about it, it might've been just been about non-canon M/M F/F ships. Yay for fuzzy memories?

You're correct about tship, slash, and femmeslash. I've also seen femslash.