Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-06-24 03:39 pm
[ SECRET POST #2000 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2000 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12. [posted twice]
__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 110 secrets from Secret Submission Post #286.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

3/10
The bait is too general though. Try referring to a specific pairing or fandom or beloved BNF next time. You might not hook as many people, but when you narrow the field you can pit the more hardcore fans and defenders of the pairing/fandom/whatever against the haters and opposition.
I think you should have stopped at "It's not sexy." It's a subtle enough statement that infers "disgusting" without making your troll face too obvious. You explained the joke in the next statement and ruined the effect. Try again next time.
Re: 3/10
Re: 3/10
(Anonymous) 2012-06-24 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)Re: 3/10
(Anonymous) 2012-06-24 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)Re: 3/10
Re: 3/10
Re: 3/10
(Anonymous) 2012-06-25 02:38 am (UTC)(link)Maybe they are trolling us with their infuriating blandness!
Re: 3/10
(Anonymous) 2012-06-25 04:46 am (UTC)(link)Re: 3/10
(Anonymous) 2012-06-25 06:26 pm (UTC)(link)Re: 3/10
I side-eyed it pretty hard at "it's not sexy", but when I read the rest it became so blatant that I just wanted to roll my eyes.
But I still had to resist the urge to say something, since you know, it's so...well...douchey.