Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-06-26 05:29 pm
[ SECRET POST #2002 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2002 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 066 secrets from Secret Submission Post #286.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - text comments ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
pretty sure the OP wasn't upset by lack of gay representation (assuming this is even true)
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'm surprised anyone is reading it 1. possibly seriously or 2. as random trolling to stir up shit. It seems pretty obvious to me that it's complaining not so much about the lack of gay characters, as the total impossibility of their theoretical (canonical) existence by EVERYONE introduced so far being matched up in a het pairing or het love triangle.
no subject
Getting some pretty arrogant vibes from you, though. "Most people"? Do you think you are the authority on sarcasm now? Maybe if most people don't see it, that's because it isn't there.
I don't see sarcasm even if I squint. Not that I think it's serious - it's probably a troll. But that's not the same thing as sarcasm. At all.
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-06-27 05:43 pm (UTC)(link)otherwise, why try to school you on the 'real' meaning behind the secret?
no subject
no subject
no subject
Luckily I've watched enough cinemas and gotten fat off enough flav-o-fives that I can easily be interfaced.
no subject
Heh, I'm just having an little electron sex party right now (not in a creepy way!) 'cause you're the first person recognize the reference in my screenname in all the years I've hung around this Place.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-06-27 03:43 am (UTC)(link)I've heard similar comments in real life, which is why I can't believe someone admitting to being homophobic.
no subject
ayrt
(Anonymous) 2012-06-27 07:45 pm (UTC)(link)Re: ayrt
no subject
O RLY? Sarcasm? SO THE ENTIRE SECRET IS ACTUALLY THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT THEY MEANT TO SAY?!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-06-27 04:17 pm (UTC)(link)