[ SECRET POST #2002 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2002 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 066 secrets from Secret Submission Post #286.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - text comments ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

SA

[(Anonymous)]

My point is, and I apologize if it got lost in my rather snarky comment, that even rehashes of the same plot, with the same characters, etc. in same medium are still different because they have been (usually) rehashed by a different person or people who bring their own flavor to project. Generally, when people say they won't read or watch remakes, what they are really saying is "I already know the plot. What's the point?" But, while you may heve seen a sunset before and know what one is supposed to look like, you've never seen this version of a sunset because you are looking at it a day older and maybe a day wiser and, hey, the sky is awfully pink and doesn't that cloud look a little like bunny?

I know when people say they don't watch remakes what they are intending to get across is Hollywood is lazy and just trying to cash in on the masses. And, yeah, that's true. But, writing off remakes just because they are remakes is shallow.

Re: SA

[meadowphoenix]

As you said, remakes are not ever exactly like the original. But you're assuming that the differences are visible, obvious, and important enough to overcome the similarities and the fatigue that inspires. For many people, they are not. The nuances simply don't change much. It feels like the same movie, with younger people and better equipment.

Hollywood has a long and detailed history of making remakes that are too close to the first and moreover contribute almost nothing to the nuances of the original or the remake itself. It isn't in the least shallow to write off remakes when the industry in general refuses to do anything inspired with them.