[ SECRET POST #2022 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2022 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 088 secrets from Secret Submission Post #289.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

physical books just aren't all the durable and almost impossible to make a physical copy of for backup uses

[(Anonymous)]

I keep hearing people say physical books aren't durable for more than 20-50 reads... but they are if you treat them like you'd treat anything of value. I have books that I've had since I was a kid that I read repeatedly, and a lot of them look brand new.

I have a 1901 copy of Emma that despite a little fading of the bindings due to sun and age is in wonderful condition. Books are the same as anything else, they will last if cared for.

[(Anonymous)]

Individuals may treat books like they're valuable but in general people don't, especially library books. I've seen library books with torn covers, writing in margins with some sort of liquid ink, ripped pages, water damage, damage from foodstuffs, mold, pages falling out and taped back together because of damaged spine, books becoming even more damaged after being taped back together because some idiot used acidic tape...

And when I lent books out to friends and explicitly told them to keep the books in mint condition, they were returned with folded corners and creased spines. Guess what? I learned my lesson. I don't let anyone borrow my favorite books anymore. The general public doesn't know how to keep books in mint condition and they don't care to even when the books are other people's property.

In my experience video game cartridges and discs can take way more abuse than paper books. If your experiences are different, good for you. You're a lucky anon.

[truxillogical]

Fun fact about libraries--nobody treats our stuff like it has any value. It doesn't belong to the patrons, so they have no problem letting their infants get their gummy little hands on it or whatever. Library books get destroyed. Frequently.

Your own personal collection, sure, those will last because you take care of them. I take care of my books, and they last. Because they're mine. The General Public will not extend the same courtesy to Free Stuff from the library. (That applies to movies too. I watch patrons let their infant child hold/open the cases to DVDs because, as far as they're concerned, it's a toy, right?)

[ariakas]

What? I treat my games like gold, but I know plenty of people who break, chip, and scratch the hell out of them in no time at all. Especially kids. Leave a DVD out of its case shiny side down and see how long it lasts.

That's why they sell game insurance. You can't make a book unreadable just by stepping on it.

[(Anonymous)]

Books don't last long in the hands of kids either. Sure books can be stepped on and still be readable, but books don't exactly survive being chucked in water, dunked in juice, being the subject of a coffee spill, drawn all over with markers and permanent markers, having pages torn out and scattered to the winds, having pages eaten.

Insurance exists because people put value on the item being insured. I think the lack in book insurance reflects how little people care about books rather than how durable it is.

[ariakas]

And yet, the argument that it's okay to resell books and not games because books are cheaper, less durable, and more replaceable is completely and utterly negated by the presence and social acceptance of the used car market.

[(Anonymous)]

Wait, what? You talked about the durability of games (DVDs) and books and insurance. I replied about the durability of books, DVDs and insurance. What does reselling books and games have to do with our conversation?

For the record, I do not think it is not okay to resell games.

[ariakas]

Yes, but your argument that it is okay to resell books because they are less expensive and less durable than games is completely negated by the fact that - unless you believe used car sales are wrong, and you'd be the first person I've ever met - it is entirely socially acceptable, with no debate, to resell your car. Cars are much, much more durable and expensive than games.

So yeah, that argument doesn't really hold water in light of what is and is not generally considered "okay" to resell.

[(Anonymous)]

When did I ever argue that it is okay to resell books? And when did I say it is not okay to resell games?

Let me repeat what I said earlier.

You talked about the durability of games (DVDs) and books and insurance. I replied about the durability of books, DVDs and insurance. What does reselling books and games have to do with our conversation?

[ariakas]

But the reason we are talking about the durability of books versus games is in the context of why it is generally considered socially acceptable to resell books, but not games.

If you didn't want to carry on that conversation, but just wanted to point out that books are less durable than games for absolutely no other reason than to point out that books are less durable than games, but that it has no bearing on the conversation at hand about reselling whatsoever, then...

...Okay, bizarre interjection taken.

[(Anonymous)]

So no one should take comments at face value and everyone need to read posts more than one parent away to reply in the correct context? Thank you for teaching me conversational tangents don't exist, master.

[ariakas]

...Because without that context, I never would have brought up their respective durability at all, so yes. Following the context conversation is a worthwhile and important skill, especially if you're going to be invested enough in the outcome to respond a week later, and get butthurt enough about it to make snide, passive-aggressive comments.

A thought, for future.

[(Anonymous)]

Whatever you say, master. Four days doesn't make a week though. You should count better.