Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-08-02 06:58 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
[ SECRET POST #2039 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2039 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08. [nf]
__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 022 secrets from Secret Submission Post #291.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-02 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
And I'd like to point out that I never said liking the trope/kink was bad, just that I think it's important to be aware of the problems within the trope.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-02 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)It is a specific form of a dynamic that is very offensive.
Quit trying to write it off as a kink because you feel bad, OP.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-02 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)and you can have a kink for problematic dynamics. it happens. nazi kink, abuse kink, rape kink i could keep going. i don't have them myself but people do and as long as it's fiction and nobody is trying to force them IRL idgaf
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-02 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)The OP is literally saying they want to use seme/uke, words that homosexuals find offensive, because ~*it's fiction*~.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-02 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)how do you talk about those tropes without using those words?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-03 12:02 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-03 12:07 am (UTC)(link)so it probably won't work
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-03 12:18 am (UTC)(link)I wouldn't call it seme/uke in other genres.
no subject
I don't know, the more I think about this the more I feel like you really shouldn't get upset that other people get upset. Like...you have to admit that the seme/uke dynamic is offensive to a lot of people, and that's okay. It's okay that they're upset and it's okay that you like it, but you can't expect people not to get upset over something that has such an offensive history and connotations attached to it.
+1
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-03 00:39 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-03 12:04 am (UTC)(link)There are perfectly good words that are NEUTRAL and don't carry all the baggage.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-03 12:08 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-03 12:10 am (UTC)(link)Dominant personality and submissive personality. Perfectly neutral, but you get who is in charge and who is submissive right off the bat. Magic!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-03 12:11 am (UTC)(link)http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Seme
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-03 00:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-03 00:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-03 01:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-05 03:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-03 10:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-03 12:59 am (UTC)(link)lol really...
Most of us don't care.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-03 01:09 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-03 01:11 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-03 01:29 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I pretty much assumed they meant "top" and "bottom" (but agree/d that the portrayals can be annoyingly narrow and unrealistic) until like... this thread
tbh
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-03 01:44 am (UTC)(link)no subject
But I still worry that part of it may be that people are really leery of feminine male bottoms (and I'd say feminine female ones, too), and I think part of that can be steeped in homophobia and misogyny.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-03 18:08 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-03 11:42 am (UTC)(link)no subject