[ SECRET POST #2041 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2041 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 125 secrets from Secret Submission Post #292.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: &

[(Anonymous)]

This is just my opinion, but after reading around, I get the impression that they were simply that good at convincing investors to throw money their way with vague "this is the future of social media networks", "look at how many users we have" clever wording.

They might even believe it themselves, and because they might have a buffer of a few more years to start actually worrying about the money, they haven't taken any protective measures beyond "try to dissuade script users like missing e from consuming more resources", or maybe even the mess that is searching by tags and such is so... choppy...? To avoid wasting more server space on that.

That still doesn't explain the insanity that is infinite scrolling and why there is a limit on how many posts you can make for every 24 hours block, but I still feel that isn't anywhere near enough.

Re: &

[(Anonymous)]

* why there isn't a bigger limit on how many posts