case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-08-18 03:14 pm

[ SECRET POST #2055 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2055 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________



21.


__________________________________________________



22.


__________________________________________________








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 137 secrets from Secret Submission Post #294.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
la_petite_singe: (Default)

[personal profile] la_petite_singe 2012-08-19 03:21 am (UTC)(link)
I was having this conversation with a friend a few weeks ago--I am really not sure what the series overall was trying to say about cops, really. In the first one they were basically useless and corrupt, except for Gordon. Then in the second one they were kinda better because of Batman's influence, I guess, but then there was some weird hubris going on there when the Commissioner was killed by the Joker and their solution was to MARCH DOWN MAIN STREET ALL TOGETHER and make themselves total sitting ducks for some godforsaken reason. And then the "NO MOAR DEAD COPS!" always makes me go "...orrr...anyone, right?" And then in TDKR the cops are clearly influential enough that Bane feels the need to bury them all underground while Gotham destroys itself, but then they get out and it's cops vs. citizens, and I guess we're supposed to be on the cops' side...? And somehow they win in the end? I really cannot decide what the message was. I really loved that these movies actually tried to have symbolism and complex themes and all, rather than just BATMAN BLOWS THINGS UP FOREVER, but sometimes it was a little...muddled.

And it was hilarious that they kept calling Blake a "hothead" when he was, like, entirely tranquil.

(Anonymous) 2012-08-19 04:40 am (UTC)(link)
Agreed. I think a lot of my issues with TDKR stem from my attempts to make sense of the symbolism or analyze the movie in any meaningful way. I felt that the last movie made some interesting points about violence/evil/chaos/society, and I think I was just looking for something like that in this movie.

But in TDKR, there's not really much there. There's clearly some sort of shout out to Occupy, and also callbacks to the Soviet experiment, but... where do you go with that? Yes, communism failed? Maybe class warfare fails equally badly in an anarchy? Don't hate rich people because the .000001% will return in a fancy piece of billion dollar technology and save you? Seriously, where do you go with it? Maybe I'm missing something.

Alternatively, I should stop trying to analyze comic book movies and just enjoy the lights and dramatic music.
intrigueing: (hulk saves iron man)

[personal profile] intrigueing 2012-08-19 06:13 am (UTC)(link)
Nah, I think your criticism is dead on. See, if they wanted to make a comic book movie that was all lights and dramatic music, they should've stuck to that. Look at Superman from 1978. Look at Batman from 1989. Hell, The Avengers didn't try to be more than a straightforward heroes vs villain superhero story either, even if it had more-complex-than-usual characterizations and world-building courtesy of preceding films. Those are good movies that don't address a fraction of multi-layered issues that the Nolan trilogy did, and never tried to.

There's nothing wrong with a comic book movie just being great timelessly enjoyable and relatable entertainment without much complexity if that's what you're aiming for, but if you're going to go out on a limb and make a comic book movie into a really complex and symbolic piece full of all sorts of socio-political and philosophical commentary that weaves topical relevant themes into it's narrative, then you have an obligation to follow through with it and do it properly.

You can't go BUT NO IT'S A COMIC BOOK MOVIE YOU DON'T HAVE TO ANALYZE IT when people complain about the problems, because, um, no, it stopped being "just a comic book movie" when you decided to try to tackle all that deep stuff. Now it's a failed attempt at a "deep" movie and all that commentary you tried to do is so much pointless waffling that goes nowhere, clogging up the lights and dramatic music that are the only successfully-done parts of the movie.

(Anonymous) 2012-08-19 06:27 am (UTC)(link)
AYRT

Yes. This. Thank you. I've talked to some of my friends about my problems with the movie, and the sort of amorphous sense of dissatisfaction I felt after watching it, and their responses were mostly *shrug* lolcomicz. But this comment sums up exactly why I think it's fair to criticize this movie on symbolic grounds-- because that's the arena Nolan herded us into. It is evident he intended the whole trilogy to be worth discussing on a deeper level.

I think I might also hold the plot line to a higher standard because of it. There were tons of niggling little things that bugged me (number one and most annoying and no one else ever seems to care: HOW DID THEY KNOW TO TURN OFF HIS POWER. Is his power company in the habit of regularly checking its clients stock portfolios, just to see if they might fail to pay next month's bill?? That seems hinky at best, Gotham Electric Co. Not to mention that even if he kept a vast majority of his money in stock of his own company (which. I won't even touch on that.), I sincerely doubt he had $0 in all private accounts. He can probably afford a couple hundred, even thousand, for electricity. But I digress.), and I think it's because the movies push themselves as sort of gritty realism in an alternate reality, and if you want to do that, you should at least aim for internal consistency. I know, drama is drama and makes for good Movie Moments, but if your viewers are pulled out of the Movie Moment by "waitwhatwtf?", it's less compelling. I want to be caring about Bruce's journey, not calculating his personal wealth. Though really, ymmv here more, because I know plenty of people who would call me unnecessarily nitpicky. I promise, I'm not even like this with most movies.
intrigueing: (tony arm porn)

[personal profile] intrigueing 2012-08-19 04:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I totally get this. I mean, I personally didn't hate the movie, but I pretty much agree with most people's complaints about it, like forgottenjester's rants up above. Those flaws didn't bother me quite as much as they bothered some other people for some reason (possibly because I didn't really have any emotional investment in any of the characters other than Alfred and Gordon, so I didn't care if anyone was being stupid or had their potential being wasted or anything), but I can definitely see exactly why those things would really bother someone else.