Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-09-01 03:47 pm
[ SECRET POST #2069 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2069 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

[The City of Dreaming Books]
__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

[Teen Girl Squad]
__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

[Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind]
__________________________________________________
14.

[Avengers]
__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

[The Monkees]
__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Important: I'm really sorry about this, but I accidentally clicked the wrong thing and deleted the submission post from last week instead of saving it. Managed to save the first page (25) of secrets, but the rest (a bit over 100) are gone.
If you submitted something last week (Aug 26-Sept 1), please resubmit it here and it will still go up this week.
The submissions post for next week is linked below as usual.
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #296.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-04 09:39 pm (UTC)(link)Let's say you're right, based on your experience with offenders (those who act on their attractions to minors) that they are motivated by power differential and therefore both pre- and post-pubescent children are attractive to them. However, those who act on their attractions to minors do not constitute the entire population of people who have such attractions. Right? You admit your experience comes only from those who act on their attractions; if we drew it as a Venn diagram, the population you have knowledge of would be a circle, and the population you're trying to generalize about is a larger circle, of which your knowledge is only a part. How much larger is the larger circle? By definition, you don't know.
So suppose that among those who have attractions, but don't act on them, pedophilia is very uncommon, but ephebophilia is amazingly common. This is in fact what we would expect evolution to produce; evolution doesn't select for individuals who only find potential partners attractive several years *after* their reproductive years have begun. And this is what scientific study does indicate: that most males do in fact have sexual attraction to teenage girls, even though it's just a minority that act upon such attraction.