Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-09-08 03:44 pm
[ SECRET POST #2076 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2076 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 5 pages, 108 secrets from Secret Submission Post #297.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 1 2 3 4 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
Additionally, it's not really bi-erasure when by sheer numbers there's more bisexual characters in the comic than anything else -- however it is funny you made that statement when in the same secret you are pissed that people claim that it's homosexual erasure to ship her with guy characters.
When you yourself are claiming bisexual erasure to not do that.
So, which is it? Is it erasure to ignore a character's canon sexuality or not? (I personally have a preference for keeping canonly gay characters that way since it's so rare to have them, but I really don't give a fuck what other people ship.)