[ SECRET POST #2079 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2079 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 057 secrets from Secret Submission Post #297.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: anon for obvious reasons

[ill_omened]

Negative vs positive freedoms.

Theoretically the woman made the decisions to knowingly take acts that might make her pregnant and bears the responsibility to have her body used to support a life as she created it, whereas obviously in rape this isn't the case and killing is considered acceptable in this case (there's plenty of other examples of this).

the incest exception is th eone that throws me for the loop.

p.s. for the record I don't believe this, am pro-choice blah blah but it holds together as a coherent ideology and a lot of the critiques of it are trite bumper car arguments.

Re: anon for obvious reasons

[veronica_rich]

See, I don't get this. So a precious, innocent life should be preserved at all costs ... unless it causes one specific kind of distress to the woman? Then it's acceptable to kill it and there's no stain on anyone's soul? Questioning that brand of logic doesn't seem especially argumentative, but that's just IMO of course.

Re: anon for obvious reasons

[ariakas]

As anon above pointed out, conservatives can rationalize capital punishment and war in spite of the "sanctity of life", so it doesn't seem like much of a reach to claim similar exceptional circumstances make rape abortion acceptable.

Incest is just plain old eugenics, though.

Re: anon for obvious reasons

[veronica_rich]

I can see justifying capital punishment even from their POV, but not war - I know what you mean, though. (I also realize that the conservative platform has a whole bunch of points that either contradict or smash into each other under a little scrutiny; this is just one of many that confuses me.)