[ SECRET POST #2080 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2080 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 034 secrets from Secret Submission Post #297.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 3 4 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Your views on concrit

[(Anonymous)]

I mostly think that if you put your stuff out there in a format where reviews are possible, then unless you've specifically said "no concrit," you've pretty much tacitly agreed to take the bad with the good. It's not really about improving, in my view--it's that people are going to react to your stuff, and there's something rather contemptible about saying "I want to know what people think--but only if it's unqualified squeeing."

Still, there's no denying that some people are incredibly condescending and nasty when dispensing what they claim is constructive criticism.