Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-09-14 06:55 pm
[ SECRET POST #2082 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2082 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

[Fate/Zero]
__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
05. [SPOILERS for Journey Into Mystery/Everything Burns]

__________________________________________________
06. [SPOILERS for Avengers]

__________________________________________________
07. [SPOILERS for Sweeney Todd]

__________________________________________________
08. [SPOILERS]

__________________________________________________
[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
09. [WARNING for depression/suicide]

[Wilby Wonderful (2004)]
__________________________________________________
10. [WARNING for abuse]

[True Blood]
__________________________________________________
11. [WARNING for rape]

__________________________________________________
12. [WARNING for suicide/self-harm]

[Alex Gaskarth/All Time Low]
__________________________________________________
13. [WARNING for abuse]

__________________________________________________
14. [WARNING for abuse/bullying]

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #297.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ],.
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: 0.1/10
Re: 0.1/10
That means that we have three options: 1) the Avengers fandom dies out 2) Avengers 2 or the other sequels really suck and enrage people, or 3) Loki wank will continue forever and ever and ever.
(Seriously, can anyone tell me if there's any other wanks in the fandom? I'm racking my brains and can't think of any).
Re: 0.1/10
(Anonymous) 2012-09-14 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)Re: 0.1/10
Re: 0.1/10
(Anonymous) 2012-09-14 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)Re: 0.1/10
Re: 0.1/10
There's also some comics vs. movies wank, but that's mostly shippy stuff too (Clint/Natasha vs. Clint/Bobbi comes to mind). And Nick... poor hated on Nick because OMG HE'S MORE EVIL THAT LOKI. [epic eyeroll]
Re: 0.1/10
(Anonymous) 2012-09-15 01:00 am (UTC)(link)Re: 0.1/10
Re: 0.1/10
(Anonymous) 2012-09-15 01:41 am (UTC)(link)that thread was huge and i think ppl wear still commenting on it three days later on why this pairing works
lets just say ships have left port with less than canon hints of mutual liking and caring
Re: 0.1/10
...um, that really squicks me out. But I haven't ever fought with anyone over it or seen any fights.
Re: 0.1/10
(Anonymous) 2012-09-15 03:18 am (UTC)(link)Re: 0.1/10
(Anonymous) 2012-09-15 12:19 am (UTC)(link)I headdesked repeatedly over that.
Re: 0.1/10
Re: 0.1/10
(Anonymous) 2012-09-15 04:00 pm (UTC)(link)Re: 0.1/10
(Anonymous) 2012-09-16 07:07 am (UTC)(link)Re: 0.1/10
Superhusbands
Clint/Coulson being a huge ship
Natasha/Pepper/Jane/Darcy not being well-written characters
Also there's the occasional "Is Thor/Loki incest or pseudoincest" wank, which technically involves Loki but doesn't really focus on his characterization the way most Loki-related wank does.
I think there's more Loki wank because it doesn't get too personal or touch upon SJ issues in the same way other topics sometimes do. Like, it's not uncommon to hear C/C complainers bring up ATG and how it's problematic, and any wank about a female character's portrayal is going to get pretty heated. The worst thing about Loki wank is the armchair psychoanalysis that goes on. (Loki apologists = insecure teenagers projecting their ~issues!~, Loki haters = unable to comprehend complexity or nuance!) Which is stupid, but not as troubling as stuff that comes up with other wanks.
So I guess I'd rather see mountains of Loki wank over...almost anything else. Huh.
Re: 0.1/10
You know what? I'm kind of okay with that. At least people are taking a closer look at things that could be problematic.
Re: 0.1/10
And to be fair, I haven't seen many arguments devolve into wank. Like if someone points out that Natasha's portrayal has some problematic aspects (which is especially true in IM2) people don't instantly assume troll or dismiss that opinion as stupid. Instead of a wankfest there are genuine discussions, for the most part.
Loki stuff is the only thing that people get consistently wanky over, at least in my admittedly limited experience.
Re: 0.1/10
Honestly most of the discussions I've had re: Natasha's protrayal in IM2 (which... yikes, yeah. No thanks) or fandom's tendency to ignore or paint Nick Fury as a bigger villain that Loki and Thanos combined (which... ew. That's just... ew.) have been relatively reasonable. But if Loki's name comes up, the chaos reigns. lol
Re: 0.1/10
(Anonymous) 2012-09-15 04:37 am (UTC)(link)Re: 0.1/10
I get being cynical about this stuff, but it is okay to spot the problems with stuff you like and discuss those problems without it being wanky or self-important.
Re: 0.1/10
(Anonymous) 2012-09-15 09:11 am (UTC)(link)