case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-09-14 06:55 pm

[ SECRET POST #2082 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2082 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Fate/Zero]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________












[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]












05. [SPOILERS for Journey Into Mystery/Everything Burns]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Avengers]



__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for Sweeney Todd]



__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS]



__________________________________________________













[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]














09. [WARNING for depression/suicide]

[Wilby Wonderful (2004)]


__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for abuse]

[True Blood]


__________________________________________________



11. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



12. [WARNING for suicide/self-harm]

[Alex Gaskarth/All Time Low]


__________________________________________________



13. [WARNING for abuse]



__________________________________________________



14. [WARNING for abuse/bullying]



__________________________________________________







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #297.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ],.
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
serenitysquid: (Default)

Re: 0.1/10

[personal profile] serenitysquid 2012-09-14 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)
You're kidding, right? We will never be done with wanky Loki secrets. The trolls are going to keep on submitting them until the Avengers fandom finds something else to wank about.
intrigueing: (hulk saves iron man)

Re: 0.1/10

[personal profile] intrigueing 2012-09-14 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh god. It occurs to me that there's nothing else wanky about the Avengers fandom! It's all sweetness and light and fluff and h/c and porn with no ship wars and no character-bashing and no wall-banging or base-breaking events that people have conflicting interpretations of! Loki's the ONLY thing about the fandom that rage-filled internet snobs can use as an outlet for their wank-instinct!

That means that we have three options: 1) the Avengers fandom dies out 2) Avengers 2 or the other sequels really suck and enrage people, or 3) Loki wank will continue forever and ever and ever.

(Seriously, can anyone tell me if there's any other wanks in the fandom? I'm racking my brains and can't think of any).

Re: 0.1/10

(Anonymous) 2012-09-14 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)
I've heard there's a bit of wank about Natasha sometimes, because misogyny
serenitysquid: (Default)

Re: 0.1/10

[personal profile] serenitysquid 2012-09-14 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)
I've seen a little wank over whether or not Black Widow was a proper "strong female character" and a few arguments over which of the solo movies was the worst, but other than that? Most Avengerwank is somehow related to Loki. And I suspect that the next Thor movie will provide us with enough Loki-wankbait to last for a long, long time.

Re: 0.1/10

(Anonymous) 2012-09-14 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)
what about shipping wank? its always entertaining
intrigueing: (Default)

Re: 0.1/10

[personal profile] intrigueing 2012-09-15 12:18 am (UTC)(link)
I actually haven't seen any shipping wank that doesn't involve Loki. What are the main ship wars in this fandom?
dazzledfirestar: (Default)

Re: 0.1/10

[personal profile] dazzledfirestar 2012-09-15 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
Speculation on Natasha/Bucky vs. Natasha/Clint caused some... but not a lot. Just some noisy screeching about OMg It'S CANNON YOU GyYS!

There's also some comics vs. movies wank, but that's mostly shippy stuff too (Clint/Natasha vs. Clint/Bobbi comes to mind). And Nick... poor hated on Nick because OMG HE'S MORE EVIL THAT LOKI. [epic eyeroll]

Re: 0.1/10

(Anonymous) 2012-09-15 01:00 am (UTC)(link)
duuuuuuuuuuude, dontchu remember the avengers family wank we had a few weeks ago?
intrigueing: (Default)

Re: 0.1/10

[personal profile] intrigueing 2012-09-15 01:12 am (UTC)(link)
No...that doesn't ring a bell. What was that about?

Re: 0.1/10

(Anonymous) 2012-09-15 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
oh someone mentioned it downthread its tony and steve being a cute gay couple together and raising peter parker as their son

that thread was huge and i think ppl wear still commenting on it three days later on why this pairing works

lets just say ships have left port with less than canon hints of mutual liking and caring
intrigueing: (Default)

Re: 0.1/10

[personal profile] intrigueing 2012-09-15 03:05 am (UTC)(link)
Oohhhhhh that thing.

...um, that really squicks me out. But I haven't ever fought with anyone over it or seen any fights.

Re: 0.1/10

(Anonymous) 2012-09-15 03:18 am (UTC)(link)
well yeah people are calmer and more reasonable here but its shit on tumblr

Re: 0.1/10

(Anonymous) 2012-09-15 12:19 am (UTC)(link)
You missed the wank on Tumblr when the title of the second Captain America movie was released. People actually got capslock angry because OH NOES A CANON LOVE INTEREST OF NATASHA WILL BREAK UP MY CLINT/NATASHA PAIRING and OH NOES CAP AMERICA'S BUDDY IS BACK AND HE MIGHT TRY TO BREAK UP TONY/STEVE.

I headdesked repeatedly over that.
intrigueing: (tony arm porn)

Re: 0.1/10

[personal profile] intrigueing 2012-09-15 12:54 am (UTC)(link)
But...but Tony and Steve aren't togeth-- oh fuck it.

Re: 0.1/10

(Anonymous) 2012-09-15 04:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Trying to use logic will only bring you pain. Just don't bother.

Re: 0.1/10

(Anonymous) 2012-09-16 07:07 am (UTC)(link)
And then there's Sam Wilson and Sharon Carter to be pissy about as well, no matter what your ship.
terabient: Anime-styled profile pic that is kinda, sorta like me (Marvel: Thor - Bored)

Re: 0.1/10

[personal profile] terabient 2012-09-15 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
Not-Loki things I have seen people complain about:

Superhusbands
Clint/Coulson being a huge ship
Natasha/Pepper/Jane/Darcy not being well-written characters

Also there's the occasional "Is Thor/Loki incest or pseudoincest" wank, which technically involves Loki but doesn't really focus on his characterization the way most Loki-related wank does.

I think there's more Loki wank because it doesn't get too personal or touch upon SJ issues in the same way other topics sometimes do. Like, it's not uncommon to hear C/C complainers bring up ATG and how it's problematic, and any wank about a female character's portrayal is going to get pretty heated. The worst thing about Loki wank is the armchair psychoanalysis that goes on. (Loki apologists = insecure teenagers projecting their ~issues!~, Loki haters = unable to comprehend complexity or nuance!) Which is stupid, but not as troubling as stuff that comes up with other wanks.

So I guess I'd rather see mountains of Loki wank over...almost anything else. Huh.
dazzledfirestar: (Default)

Re: 0.1/10

[personal profile] dazzledfirestar 2012-09-15 12:44 am (UTC)(link)
So basically the wank in Avengers fandom is centered around legitimate concerns about equality (don't get me started on fandom's treatment of Nick) unless it's about Loki.

You know what? I'm kind of okay with that. At least people are taking a closer look at things that could be problematic.
terabient: Anime-styled profile pic that is kinda, sorta like me (Default)

Re: 0.1/10

[personal profile] terabient 2012-09-15 01:44 am (UTC)(link)
...pretty much!

And to be fair, I haven't seen many arguments devolve into wank. Like if someone points out that Natasha's portrayal has some problematic aspects (which is especially true in IM2) people don't instantly assume troll or dismiss that opinion as stupid. Instead of a wankfest there are genuine discussions, for the most part.

Loki stuff is the only thing that people get consistently wanky over, at least in my admittedly limited experience.
dazzledfirestar: (Default)

Re: 0.1/10

[personal profile] dazzledfirestar 2012-09-15 08:06 am (UTC)(link)
That's been my experience too, actually. I think the misunderstanding around this is the definition of wank. To some people any disagreement on a topic can be wank (and it sometimes is, obviously) but to me, it means digging your heels on a silly point and not budging, as you say.

Honestly most of the discussions I've had re: Natasha's protrayal in IM2 (which... yikes, yeah. No thanks) or fandom's tendency to ignore or paint Nick Fury as a bigger villain that Loki and Thanos combined (which... ew. That's just... ew.) have been relatively reasonable. But if Loki's name comes up, the chaos reigns. lol

Re: 0.1/10

(Anonymous) 2012-09-15 04:37 am (UTC)(link)
Oh please, when has fandom ever been concerned about equality? The SJ types will continue to preach among themselves in a big circle jerk while the ATG types will continue to ignore everything to write their 100,000 coffee shop AUs. Each side will continue to feel morally superior to the other side without ever compromising. Case in point: this wank.
dazzledfirestar: (Default)

Re: 0.1/10

[personal profile] dazzledfirestar 2012-09-15 08:08 am (UTC)(link)
Fandom in general? Rarely. SJWs will pick at whatever the cause de jour is, yes. But there are people legitimating discussing the topics at hand that aren't just in it for the circle jerk or ass pats.

I get being cynical about this stuff, but it is okay to spot the problems with stuff you like and discuss those problems without it being wanky or self-important.

Re: 0.1/10

(Anonymous) 2012-09-15 09:11 am (UTC)(link)
+1