fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2084 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2084 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11.

__________________________________________________

12.

__________________________________________________

13.

__________________________________________________

14.

__________________________________________________

15.

__________________________________________________

16.

__________________________________________________

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 094 secrets from Secret Submission Post #298.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

He deserves better than such a flat character.

Funny, I thought he was the flat one.

B-, but would lol again.

Methinks if anything, it's the other way round.

HEY

i happen to think scarjo has nice boobs. SIZEIST

lolz!

You left the "S" off the front of that sentence, bb.

LOL at people trying to argue that Black Widow had more depth than Loki. BW and Hawkeye in the movies at least are little more than glorified extras in leather whereas Loki's tragedy was one of the focal points of Thor.

Look at how you're comparing it, though.

In Thor, Loki was well developed.
That was in Thor.

Hawkeye and Black Widow didn't have a movie (yet) and Loki wasn't all that fleshed out in this movie either.

There were some disappointing constraints in Avengers due to time and probably other things, but I don't think that makes their characters flat. If anything, fanfic writers can expand on it based on what they know from comics that they may still be able to infer from the movies.

LOL at you acting like Black Widow and Hawkeye had the same treatment or amount of screentime in the Avengers movie. Hawkeye spent most of the movie mind-controlled and thus got very little character development, yes. But Natasha? Did most of the actual verbs in that movie. Including outsmarting the trickster god and closing the interdimensional portal to save the world. Did you just sleep through all the scenes that didn't have Loki in them?

Yes she was active but that hardly means she had any depth besides the exposition backstory delivered by other characters. She's just the "hot action chick in black leather" cliche.

Plus she had Iron Man 2 to flesh out her character and even there she didn't do much besides being "badass".

Trying to argue that Loki is a flat character when he's easily one of the most complex characters in the entire Marvel Cinematic Universe and that Black Widow is rounded in comparison is absurd.

easily one of the most complex characters in the entire Marvel Cinematic Universe

lol no.

He's more complex than Obadiah Stane or the Red Skull, but no :D

Actually, yes.

After Thor and Iron Man, Loki's the character with the most character development. Even the critics who didn't like the movie thought his arc was rather well-done.

That people are actually trying to argue that his character is flat and that he's less complex than a generic stock action girl archetype boggles the mind.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-17 00:14 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-17 00:47 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-17 02:04 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-17 02:20 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-17 02:26 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-17 02:47 (UTC) - Expand

nayrt

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-17 03:00 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-17 03:57 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-17 04:05 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-17 21:12 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-18 04:03 (UTC) - Expand

astridv - 2012-09-17 07:53 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-17 16:59 (UTC) - Expand

intrigueing - 2012-09-17 00:17 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-17 00:23 (UTC) - Expand

intrigueing - 2012-09-17 00:31 (UTC) - Expand

DA

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-17 14:10 (UTC) - Expand

he's easily one of the most complex characters in the entire Marvel Cinematic Universe

Lol! You're killing me here, anon--are we actually talking about movie!Loki? You sure you didn't mean comics!Loki? Because movie!Loki is a whiny brat. Some of his complaints are valid (to a lesser extent than he complains about them) but for the most part, he's as complex as toast. Somewhat sympathetic toast.

Just admit you think he's hot and move on, Loki-stan.

I'm actually not into guys, so my interest in Loki has nothing to do with Hiddleston being hot. I am into girls, and I find ScarJo to be hot, but I also found her character to be bland. So clearly sexual attraction is not a factor into which characters I like.

No, I genuinely found his character and storyline to be compelling and I thought Hiddleston did a good job playing him.

Maybe Loki's not up there with Roy Batty but he's definitely more interesting than most of the characters in the Avengers movies thus far.

She's just the "hot action chick in black leather" cliche.

Wow, so no. We also got a little backstory/character on her in IronMan 2. She's way more interesting, objectively, than Hawkeye in the movie, despite my love for both characters.

"She's just the "hot action chick in black leather" cliche."

lol are you serious right now? See above post. She carried the movie. Also, they didn't exactly have TIME to develop her character in Avengers. It was a bit fucking packed with other shit. Black Widow's backstory would not a good subplot make.

And Iron Man 2 wasn't about her. She was shrouded in mystery because Tony didn't know about her.

Here's hoping we actually get an origins story for her.

But you are right in that Loki is one of the most complex characters and Natasha isn't rounded when you compare the two.

LOL
You really ought to take off the Loki goggles every now and then, they're distorting your view.

Likewise, you should take off the Natasha Goggles if you're so far up your own ass that you accuse anyone who doesn't like Black Widow to be a secret sexist/troll.

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-17 21:14 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-17 21:16 (UTC) - Expand

Lmao.

wow here we go again

loki deserves shit all

+A on that shitstirring

Well done on getting this to be the first comment

lol no but nice try