case: ([ Devilbats; Fandom sucks. ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-08-06 06:24 pm

[ SECRET POST #213 ]


⌈ Secret Post #213 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 094 secrets from Secret Submission Post #031.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 ] broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom, [ 1 ] repeat.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Tuesday, August 7th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[identity profile] luzerna.livejournal.com 2007-08-06 10:42 pm (UTC)(link)
7. Forgive me, but how are those... not real icons? I mean, most icons are just saturated screenshots, maybe with some lettering or fancy lines, or simple coloured manga scans. If the people who do those aren't "real" iconists, please show me someone who you do consider to be one.

8. Thumbs up to you!

19. As I've heard it, it typically means the person in question takes the canon way too seriously and she harps on people who don't think of the characters the same way she does, which is the "canon", or hates people who write what-if scenarios instead of being needle-straight in line with the actual plot. And she pitches fights when her ideas of canon conflict with someone else's. That's why being called a canon nazi is usually an insult.

[identity profile] hezul.livejournal.com 2007-08-07 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
Pssh, everyone knows icons don't count unless they have five dozen textures and maybe some annoying blinky animation thrown in for good measure. ;D

[identity profile] gallo-de-pelea.livejournal.com 2007-08-07 06:34 pm (UTC)(link)
and tiny, unreadable text and bizarre placement of punctuation marks