Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-09-26 06:45 pm
[ SECRET POST #2094 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2094 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #299.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - ships it ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
The thing is, I don't care for bulging packages or enormous biceps. Asses are nice though. Maybe we should put the window there?
Personally I would rather see more male heroes in heels.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-26 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)Even an ass window wouldn't cut it--not on a guy. People don't go around hoping a guy will bend over so you can see his ass crack; that's generally a source of comic relief in overweight plumbers.
You aren't doing this right.
no subject
Do I honestly think anything I'm proposing would happen? No. Do I want it to? Not really. Do I instead want women to be treated with more respect when they are designed and not objectified? Yes.
Damn anon.
"You aren't doing this right."
What a laugh. All I was saying was that, in a perfect world scenario, if you objectify the sexes equally, will I complain? No. Equally objectified. Whatever. If you don't objectify the sexes, will I complain? Uh, no. If you objectify the unequally, for example, women being sex dolls and men not, will I complain? Yes.
I was putting forth the idea about them both being objectified equally. Do I think that's actually possible? I'm not really sure.
But don't you dare tell me I'm doing feminism wrong. I could have sworn we, as feminists, looked down on that mentality. Even if you don't agree with me, which is fine, I don't think you can call me "doing it wrong" over a simple, flippant joke.
I'm sorry I'm really mean right now. I'm just kind of upset with you.
DA
(Anonymous) 2012-09-27 07:19 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
It's...
It's funny and slightly frightening. I kind of love it.
no subject
EDIT: A link to the rest of the one shot, in case you were interested [I've only really seen that particular page floating around, so I thought I'd offer]
http://scans-daily.dreamwidth.org/3047371.html?thread=102940363
no subject
no subject
no subject
BTW, I have to ask, is that the Cheshire Cat in your icon?
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-26 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-27 04:20 am (UTC)(link)Just don't want you to be caught unawares ;D
no subject
no subject
no subject
His glorious hair! Stunning jawline! Little white panties!
no subject
Not to mention his fabulous heels!
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-27 12:05 am (UTC)(link)no subject