Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-10-03 05:42 pm
[ SECRET POST #2101 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2101 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12. [repeat]
__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 040 secrets from Secret Submission Post #300.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 2 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - take it to comments ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-04 06:01 am (UTC)(link)(I know this was several seasons ago, but) For example, the use of their case as the subject of his book, without their knowledge or consent, struck me as extremely unethical and a breach of the doctor-patient confidentiality contracts they should have had. It certainly would and should've ruined their ability to work with him to any effect, as trust is a major component in the effectiveness of any psychologist and Sweets broke that.