case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-10-05 05:47 pm

[ SECRET POST #2103 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2103 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Derren Brown - Trick of the Mind]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.
[Quantum Leap]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.
[Necessary Roughness]


__________________________________________________



07. http://imageshack.us/a/img811/3861/tumblrm9siebsjna1rym8lc.jpg
[nudity which is possibly sexual? / illustrated]


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
[Team Starkid]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Teen Wolf]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Evangelion]


__________________________________________________



12.
[High School of the Dead]


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________












[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ---- ]












15. [SPOILERS for Teen Wolf]



__________________________________________________



16. [SPOILERS for Everything Burns/Journey Into Mystery]



__________________________________________________



17. [SPOILERS for To Boldly Flee]



__________________________________________________



18. [SPOILERS for Lord of the Rings]



__________________________________________________



19. [SPOILERS for Homestuck]



__________________________________________________















[ -----TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ---- ]













20. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #300.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2012-10-05 10:05 pm (UTC)(link)
different marriage styles for different folks but

-i dont grok tolerating her for even a minute
-i dont grok a marriage where you see each other that infrequently as routine and not a temporary thing
-i dont grok polyamory

so their relationship is an absolute fucking mystery to me

(Anonymous) 2012-10-05 10:11 pm (UTC)(link)
THEY'RE POLYAMOROUS? Wow, that might be the only thing I like about her.

(Anonymous) 2012-10-05 10:14 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think either of them have ever publicly said they are?

On the other hand, there's a song on her new album that sure seems to be about sleeping with female fans on tour and knowing her husband isn't that thrilled about it but he'll have to accept that's the way it's gotta be.

(Anonymous) 2012-10-05 10:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Let's hope it's just a songtext, if not he should leave her. Someone who doesn't care how uneasy their partner is with them sleeping around should be single. Then they can have all the fun with doing it without hurting their partner. Sexual freedom is one thing, but if you have a partner their feelings always need to be thought of and respected.

(Anonymous) 2012-10-05 10:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, all relationships have various compromises in them. Presumably they talked all this out before tying the knot, if he decided it was worth it that's his decision to make.

(Anonymous) 2012-10-05 10:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Of course it's his decision. Honestly, if i would know them somehow, i wouldn't even tell them the above, because clearly it's none of my business. i just don't know enough about them to know if they're happy or not, which is why i said that i hoped it was just a songtext. To me, the quote sounded too much "deal with it or else" and not enough consideration on her part. Like you said, compimises is the point of success in a realationship and the quote certainly didn't sound like that at all. if he can deal with that, ok.

(Anonymous) 2012-10-06 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
Agreed. Additionally, poly is no excuse for cheating on your partner who isn't comfortable with it. I know a few people who are poly, who cheated on their partners after agreeing to being in a monogamous relationship where it was discussed and seemingly a mutually respected decision. Except well, apparently not hence the cheating.

(Anonymous) 2012-10-06 07:41 am (UTC)(link)
that's totes how I read that song too

(Anonymous) 2012-10-05 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)
http://www.out.com/entertainment/music/2012/09/20/amanda-palmer-neil-gaiman-open-relationship

(Anonymous) 2012-10-06 01:58 am (UTC)(link)
Weirdly, that makes me feel better about them. I still find her obnoxious in the extreme, but if it's an open relationship it's not as eyerolly somehow. - OP

(Anonymous) 2012-10-05 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't grok liking members of the same sex.

So gay relationships are an absolute fucking mystery to me.

(Anonymous) 2012-10-05 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
It wasn't trolling. I have a serious problem with people who are incapable of understanding a sexual interest or relationship that is outside of what they themselves are interested in. I was trying to illustrate the absurdity and fuckery that, from my perspective, is involved in saying what the original anon did. And it was fueled by anger, I'm not gonna lie.
stainless: Megatron and Starscream standing in wreckage, reads ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US (Default)

[personal profile] stainless 2012-10-05 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay. My bad.

I don't get the outrage, though. I mean, celebrity gossip's annoying, but given that people do gossip about celebs, well... some that do are going to think "so and so isn't good for so-and-so."

So I'm not sure I'm seeing what's so awful. But that may be because I've always thought AFP seemed pretty full of herself, so I dunno.
caecilia: (Jade 8D)

[personal profile] caecilia 2012-10-06 01:32 am (UTC)(link)
I think they were just annoyed that the other anon is judgey of people's relationships.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-10-06 07:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] caecilia - 2012-10-06 18:45 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2012-10-07 03:15 am (UTC)(link)
She IS full of herself!
ariakas: (Default)

[personal profile] ariakas 2012-10-06 12:06 am (UTC)(link)
Really? This seems pretty normal to me.

-For older dudes, an attractive (much) younger woman is a status symbol, but often not someone with whom they would have anything in common, so seeing her infrequently is probably not something he minds.

-For a younger woman with a budding career, his primary benefit to her as an established older man is his ability to promote her career, hence all the pimping of her materials by him.

-Dudes as old as Gaiman have a really hard time keeping up with the sexual drive of a much younger woman, hence polyamory to keep her satisfied.

It all seems pretty logical.

(Anonymous) 2012-10-06 04:33 am (UTC)(link)
It all seems like you're wild mass guessing.

(Anonymous) 2012-10-06 04:49 am (UTC)(link)
I'm sorry but Neil Gaiman is in no way old. He's barely fifty.She'S 36 that's fifteen years. What are we even talking about?

(Anonymous) 2012-10-06 08:27 am (UTC)(link)
That's about the same age difference as Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher, but people acted as if he married a fossile.
visp: (Default)

[personal profile] visp 2012-10-06 05:30 am (UTC)(link)
Dude, they're both part of that crazy, artsy, quasi-goth scene, they collaborate on pieces, I'm sure they have lots to talk about.

(Anonymous) 2012-10-06 07:30 am (UTC)(link)
If you're under twenty. Old? Please.

(Anonymous) 2012-10-06 11:32 am (UTC)(link)
...what?

You're talking as if she's 20 and he's 80. He's middle-aged, not old, and she's just a few years shy of middle age. Also, her career is pretty well-established at this point. She's been doing it a looooooong time.

(Anonymous) 2012-10-06 07:28 pm (UTC)(link)
-i dont grok a marriage where you see each other that infrequently as routine and not a temporary thing
So people whose spouses are in the military for many years, that's something you can't understand either?

(Anonymous) 2012-10-06 08:48 pm (UTC)(link)
obviously not