[ SECRET POST #216 ]

[degrees.livejournal.com]

⌈ Secret Post #216 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2. [ not secret ]

3.

4.

5. [ repeat ]

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.



Notes:

Feed me? :D

Also! Not secret? NICE TRY. *dies* XD

Secrets Left to Post: 0 pages, 022 secrets from Secret Submission Post #031.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, [ 1 ] not!secrets, 0 not!fandom [ 1 ] repeat.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Friday, August 10th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

18

[databomb.livejournal.com]

Sorry, but calling troll. :) Your opinion is valid, but the logic, uh-- don't think you've read the series!

Re: 18

[moontyger.livejournal.com]

So very true.

Re: 18-not the op

[(Anonymous)]

because someone doesn't like a pairing or a series, it makes them a troll?

it might be that they said it to stir up trouble. THAT makes them a troll. holding an opinion and maybe having stupid reasons for it does not make someone a troll.

or is troll what you get called now when someone doesn't agree with you or states an opinion you don't agree with?

Re: 18-not the op

[databomb.livejournal.com]

Hmm, not sure if you're going to see this, but I guess I might as well respond.

Sorry, I must have not made myself clear. I'm not calling them a troll because of their opinion - they're free to dislike characters/pairings, and I don't have anything against that at all. If they had ended the secret as just "I don't like this pairing," or "I don't see what's good about these characters," I wouldn't have taken note at all. To each, their own, after all.

However, when they state evidence that is completely against canon, I can't help but think that they said it just to raise controversy, which is why I'm calling troll.