ext_33427 (
degrees.livejournal.com) wrote in
fandomsecrets2007-08-09 03:35 pm
[ SECRET POST #216 ]
⌈ Secret Post #216 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
1.
2. [ not secret ]
3.

4.

5. [ repeat ]
6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.
13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

Notes:
Feed me? :D
Also! Not secret? NICE TRY. *dies* XD
Secrets Left to Post: 0 pages, 022 secrets from Secret Submission Post #031.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, [ 1 ] not!secrets, 0 not!fandom [ 1 ] repeat.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Friday, August 10th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: 18-not the op
(Anonymous) 2007-08-10 07:50 am (UTC)(link)it might be that they said it to stir up trouble. THAT makes them a troll. holding an opinion and maybe having stupid reasons for it does not make someone a troll.
or is troll what you get called now when someone doesn't agree with you or states an opinion you don't agree with?
Re: 18-not the op
Sorry, I must have not made myself clear. I'm not calling them a troll because of their opinion - they're free to dislike characters/pairings, and I don't have anything against that at all. If they had ended the secret as just "I don't like this pairing," or "I don't see what's good about these characters," I wouldn't have taken note at all. To each, their own, after all.
However, when they state evidence that is completely against canon, I can't help but think that they said it just to raise controversy, which is why I'm calling troll.