case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-10-08 06:30 pm

[ SECRET POST #2106 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2106 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 085 secrets from Secret Submission Post #301.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - way too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - secret posted as text ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
dirac: (Default)

(frozen comment)

[personal profile] dirac 2012-10-09 01:51 am (UTC)(link)
these discussions remind me of hydra. evey time you think you've managed to define asexuality, three more nuances pop up that'll demand their own seperate definition.

(speaking as someone who identifies as asexual, if it makes any difference)
tyger66: (Default)

(frozen comment)

[personal profile] tyger66 2012-10-09 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
I agree, it seems to get overcomplicated at times. I stick with the -sexual and -romantic words: Asexual, Biromantic. Any further labeling makes me feel a little pretentious.

(frozen comment)

(Anonymous) 2012-10-09 01:54 am (UTC)(link)
I'm trying to understand! I really am. I want to be as aware, and educated as I can be.

...but my head is starting to hurt. >_<

(frozen comment)

(Anonymous) 2012-10-09 02:04 am (UTC)(link)
A bunch of very young people with nothing better to do like to spend their time warring over who has identified with a better label or who can make up the most asinine definition for a shared label. That's all there is to it, really. One day, they will have Big People Problems, like jobs and bills, and they will look back on who they were today and cringe almost as hard as many of us are cringing watching them right now.

(frozen comment) +1

(Anonymous) 2012-10-09 02:12 am (UTC)(link)
tyger66: (Default)

(frozen comment)

[personal profile] tyger66 2012-10-09 02:14 am (UTC)(link)
Just don't bother with the super specific labels. Asexual or (some kind of)Sexual, along with a qualifying romantic term: Aromantic, Biromantic, homoromantic, etc. This grey-A, sex-negative, etc., stuff, while perhaps helpful in helping people figure out what they personally identify as, will only confuse newcomers who are seeing all this for the first time.
dirac: (Default)

(frozen comment)

[personal profile] dirac 2012-10-09 02:32 am (UTC)(link)
honestly anon, as long as you don't go around correcting the labels people have chosen for themselves, you're far and beyond the courtesy of a lot of folks.

and frankly, as far as asexuality is concerned, whether someone is one long stream of labels roughly meaning "asexual" or another, it probably won't matter in your interactions with them.* it might if you're interested in starting a relationship with them, but if that's the case i don't think knowing that they label themselves a demigrey-A-panbiromantic-sex-indifferent-enthusiast-but-only-once-in-eight-blue-moons will help as much as just sitting down and talking with them about what they want, what they're open to, and what they're expecting.


*i'm not saying those labels aren't without their place, but i think i'm inclined to go along with what tyger66 said, in that they probably have more use on a personal level than an interpersonal one (especially when the meanings of these terms get as muddied as they are). I'm not anti-labels by any means, I guess I just don't want you to get to stressed out if they go over your head? Like I said, just make sure you aren't pretending like you know more about other people's sexualities than they do themselves.
Edited 2012-10-09 02:36 (UTC)