Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2007-08-12 06:24 pm
[ SECRET POST #219 ]
⌈ Secret Post #219 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.
19.

20.

21.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 103 secrets from Secret Submission Post #032.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 ] broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Monday, August 12th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

7.
(Anonymous) 2007-08-12 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)Re: 7.
(Anonymous) 2007-08-12 11:05 pm (UTC)(link)Honestly, the arguments about freedom of speech and censorship are somewhat beside the point. The sad fact of the matter is that Six Apart are running a business here and have a perfect right to decide what they do and don't want to allow people to host on their servers. That's all it comes down to.
Re: 7.
(Anonymous) 2007-08-12 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)Re: 7.
(Anonymous) 2007-08-12 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)Re: 7.
(Anonymous) 2007-08-12 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)Re: 7.
(Anonymous) 2007-08-13 07:34 am (UTC)(link)What, have LJers never used teh internets before? I thought everyone was used to The Unwashed Masses freaking out over any miniscule sliver of a hint that there's TEH SMEX. And making your point on LJ of all place isn't going to change this general opinion... it just makes fandom look like a bunch of naive folks.
OH MY GOD
(Anonymous) 2007-08-13 08:11 pm (UTC)(link)Every time I see a "LJ Strikethrough '07" icon/post/what have you I want to kick someone in the throat.
It is a pity we're too ashamed to use our real names.
Re: 7.
(Anonymous) 2007-08-12 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)Re: 7.
(Anonymous) 2007-08-13 12:40 am (UTC)(link)duh
(Anonymous) 2007-08-13 08:12 pm (UTC)(link)Re: 7.
(Anonymous) 2007-08-13 01:09 am (UTC)(link)there were no 12 year olds represented in those images so I'm not sure where people are getting off saying that it is KIDDIE PORN OMGUGUYZ.
minors having sex? yes there were.
I'll agree that LJ can define what they want through their service. if they choose to start banning people for using the word purple in their entries, it's well within their right to do so.
just call a spade and spade. LJ needs to be specific and say 'no more images where it's not clear the two represented are adults' or 'anyone using the word purple in their entries, linking to anything that has purple, even if it's behind a locked posted, purple will get you banned' and people will be fine.