case: ([ Nii; Heh. ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-08-12 06:24 pm

[ SECRET POST #219 ]


⌈ Secret Post #219 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 103 secrets from Secret Submission Post #032.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 ] broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Monday, August 12th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: 7.

(Anonymous) 2007-08-13 01:09 am (UTC)(link)
where was the 'kid' in that image? if you can show me the 'kiddie' porn from the images that got the artists banned, I'll be inclined to shut up.

there were no 12 year olds represented in those images so I'm not sure where people are getting off saying that it is KIDDIE PORN OMGUGUYZ.

minors having sex? yes there were.

I'll agree that LJ can define what they want through their service. if they choose to start banning people for using the word purple in their entries, it's well within their right to do so.

just call a spade and spade. LJ needs to be specific and say 'no more images where it's not clear the two represented are adults' or 'anyone using the word purple in their entries, linking to anything that has purple, even if it's behind a locked posted, purple will get you banned' and people will be fine.