case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-10-21 03:40 pm

[ SECRET POST #2119 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2119 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 85 secrets from Secret Submission Post #303.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
oftheark: (Default)

[personal profile] oftheark 2012-10-22 05:55 am (UTC)(link)
Again, these are specifics about the canon, which those familiar with the canon are well within their rights to take issue with. But the OP made a blanket statement that did not take the specificity of the canon into consideration.

If for this character that is supposed to be a pose en pointe, then yes, the artist failed majorly. However, to generically state that "ballet shoes don't look/work like that" is false and I will correct those statements.

(On an aside, we were required to have ribbons on our technique shoes for exams and recitals and at some point, actually had to use worn out pointe shoes as our technique shoes, so ribbons would have been on them as well. However, this may have entirely been an RAD thing or something that's changed over the past 20 years.)

(Anonymous) 2012-10-22 06:29 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, OP was jumping the gun as being on demi-pointe is totally normal in both technique shoes and pointe shoes. I do feel like the flat, smooth, pink back to the shoe looks weird - like, no shank, no soles, no seam - but it's also pretty easy to pass that off as an artistic stylization thing.

(And yeah, ribbons are definitely used on technique shoes, I just meant that it's generally less common and the average person without much experience, like the artist, would probably associate ribbons with pointe shoes.)

The Princess Tutu fandom is really, really rife with incorrect-to-actual-ballet stuff (in art and cosplay) and to give them the benefit of the doubt, maybe OP was fed up in general and just grabbed the first art in their art folder to make the secret. Not excusing false blanket statements, but I can sympathize.
oftheark: (Default)

[personal profile] oftheark 2012-10-22 06:33 am (UTC)(link)
I think I'm glad I don't know the canon, because it would probably drive me to drink with inaccuracies.

(Anonymous) 2012-10-22 06:56 am (UTC)(link)
Haha XD The canon is actually surprisingly good about it, for the most part. I was prepared to cringe-quit partway through when I started, but it wasn't that bad. There are some kinda hilarious things, though, like how they clearly did a lot of work to make her dancing reasonably accurate but then they didn't look into how dancers run; so she finishes dancing, turns around, and then jogs off like a girl in PE class.