[ SECRET POST #2125 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2125 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 124 secrets from Secret Submission Post #304.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat x 4 and counting. Bets? ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Great essays

[(Anonymous)]

Well, the problem with the first request is that any analysis of the two parties is in itself somewhat biased and partisan - you can have, I guess, an unbiased analysis of the financial elements of politics, but for the most part, any critique or analysis of the two major political parties is going to be founded on the political understanding of the author. So there's really no one good answer to this - understanding comes from reading, assimilating, and analyzing a variety of perspectives, I think.

One essay I do want to recommend because it's very good and also incredibly relevant is Douglas Hofstadter's "The Paranoid Style In American Politics", which is a very historical analysis of the roots of certain tendencies in American politics. It was written in 1964 but I think it's even more relevant now than it was when it was written, and I think helps in understanding the mindset of many people in American politics. Link here: http://karws.gso.uri.edu/jfk/conspiracy_theory/the_paranoid_mentality/the_paranoid_style.html

Re: Great essays

[(Anonymous)]

Sounds amazing, thank you so much!!