case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-11-05 05:43 pm

(no subject)


⌈ Secret Post #2134 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #305.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
intrigueing: (Default)

Re: /Rage vent

[personal profile] intrigueing 2012-11-06 03:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, it must be annoying and frustrating for people who are just fiscally conservative, etc, to deal with the fact that voting for the party who fits their economic and governmental views means voting for the party who's trying to drag women back to the 19th century, so I get WHY they want to ignore and deny it and pretend it's not that big a deal...but that doesn't excuse them. At all. They should have some kind of grasp on reality and ignoring it can be really harmful.

Re: /Rage vent

(Anonymous) 2012-11-06 07:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Most of the guys who have said that to me weren't conservative, though.
ill_omened: (Default)

Re: Exhaustion 2012

[personal profile] ill_omened 2012-11-06 08:08 pm (UTC)(link)
It's almost like their economic and governmental views are equally 19th century, and that's why they're the only party espousing them.
intrigueing: (trio cuddling)

Re: Exhaustion 2012

[personal profile] intrigueing 2012-11-06 09:49 pm (UTC)(link)
True, but not everyone who has backwards fiscal views also has backwards views of women, social issues, etc. They're two pretty different (and often contradictory) flavors of backwardness.

But I guess that's what happens in a party system like the U.S.'s. :\