case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-11-05 05:43 pm

(no subject)


⌈ Secret Post #2134 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #305.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
ill_omened: (Default)

Re: Exhaustion 2012

[personal profile] ill_omened 2012-11-06 08:08 pm (UTC)(link)
It's almost like their economic and governmental views are equally 19th century, and that's why they're the only party espousing them.
intrigueing: (trio cuddling)

Re: Exhaustion 2012

[personal profile] intrigueing 2012-11-06 09:49 pm (UTC)(link)
True, but not everyone who has backwards fiscal views also has backwards views of women, social issues, etc. They're two pretty different (and often contradictory) flavors of backwardness.

But I guess that's what happens in a party system like the U.S.'s. :\