Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-11-11 03:45 pm
[ SECRET POST #2140 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2140 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 105 secrets from Secret Submission Post #306.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-11 09:07 pm (UTC)(link)Especially high school AUs. I seriously don't understand the appeal of them because...doesn't so much of the character have to do their setting and being whatever they are in canon? I guess people make up different backstories to explain personalities, like if they set Naruto in high school, but it just never seems to be the same to me.
Once I saw a challenge to write a Naruto AU with Neji as a business banker
and I just
I...I couldn't even wrap my head around that.
(Although, same here. People obviously enjoy them, so I just don't personally read them, after the first few I tried. Still doesn't make the concept NOT bizarre to me, though.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-12 02:04 am (UTC)(link)