Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-11-19 05:26 pm
[ SECRET POST #2148 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2148 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 080 secrets from Secret Submission Post #307.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 3 4 - doing a bit of troll-weeding ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

DA
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 03:11 am (UTC)(link)Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 03:14 am (UTC)(link)Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 03:21 am (UTC)(link)Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 03:23 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 03:30 am (UTC)(link)Women without access to safe abortions die. Romney stated he intended to overturn Roe vs. Wade.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 03:39 am (UTC)(link)DA
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 03:42 am (UTC)(link)Butting in here
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 03:25 am (UTC)(link)And, um, just because you believe Romney is better for the economy and your priorities are budget>rights doesn't mean everyone shares that belief and those priorities and that's cool.
Re: Butting in here
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 03:37 am (UTC)(link)DA
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 03:42 am (UTC)(link)Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 03:44 am (UTC)(link)Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 03:46 am (UTC)(link)The fact you're refusing to answer is telling: he had no plan.
Re: Butting in here
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 03:57 am (UTC)(link)2. Private industry is a very, very different game from public administration. "Businessmen" skills don't automatically translate. I'm not saying they can't be helpful in improving efficiency, but certain things that government provides (parks, transportation improvements, regulations, expanding communications, public goods in general) make no sense in profit-earning terms. So I don't think there's that much of an inherent advantage in having a "businessman" running the country, especially since historically, their record is mixed.
3. There aren't just two parties/candidates out there. Gary Johnson, as a Libertarian, is socially progressive and fiscally conservative; if you wanted to vote your conscience, that's a valid alternative that wouldn't have screwed anyone over.
But look, Romeny-voting anon, don't despair. The Democratic party (and the fact that it's only really got the Executive branch and half of the Legislative) isn't going to be able to get much done. Y'all will get your chance again, if you maybe smarten up about treating minorities like crap and stop it with the rape stuff.
Re: Butting in here
Re: Butting in here
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 04:13 am (UTC)(link)Try again.
Also, the President gets to pick the Justices that *will* affect how laws regarding social issues will be handled.
Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 03:37 am (UTC)(link)SA
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 03:47 am (UTC)(link)