[ SECRET POST #2148 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2148 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 080 secrets from Secret Submission Post #307.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 3 4 - doing a bit of troll-weeding ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Because Westeros, except for Dorne, has male primogeniture. Daughters only inherit if there are no sons. Sansa has absolutely no claim on the North if her brothers are alive. If there IS a king/queen in the North, someone to take over the mantle from Robb, it's either Bran or Rickon, or Jon if he leaves the NW when he finds out that Robb officially made him his heir. As long as Bran and Rickon are alive, Sansa is not Robb's (nor Ned's) heir. Sansa is not heir to anything. And I don't see her as someone who would want to take away what belongs to her brothers by the laws of Westeros.