fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2153 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2153 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11.

__________________________________________________

12.

__________________________________________________

13.

__________________________________________________

14.

__________________________________________________

15.

__________________________________________________

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 104 secrets from Secret Submission Post #308.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

That link looks purple visited on my browser. I was going all, "man, I wonder where on the internet I've been. Diet poison sure hates it I hope it's not one of my bookmarks."

And it was. Under my section devoted to sj-isms and stereotypes haha.

I'm still stupid surprised when I meet people irl who genuinely hold tjose kind of thoughts. I expect unaccountable assholery online most of the time, but even then if I get a feeling the other party really is so far up their ass on maintaining a belief in stupidity, I just get so disappointed.

On pronouns, for me, I don't mind someone making assumptions about which to use, although the connected assumptions that follow about me kinda irk me.

although the connected assumptions that follow about me kinda irk me.

Well, yeah. I mean that's kind of what it is...it's because guys assume the Internet it populated only by men, because male is the default and female is something "other". Also apparently sometimes you can assume someone is a guy from the way they talk? What?

My name on this chat room is raichu100, which I use all over the internet, and it's pretty gender-neutral. Many of the girls in places like that use really really girly handles. I hate the fact that men seem to think that if it's not a girly handle meant to advertise my gender without them having to actually to look, then I must not be a girl.

(Also, I kind of think it's basic respect to ask or look before assuming gender, but hey.)

Actually, I've always thought you were female, largely because your icon looks female to me, whether or not it looks like you.

You know, the same way I've always thought anonymouslyyours was a little lizard and case is one of those blue creatures in his icons and agentcthulu has green tentacles.

F!S sure is diverse.

/silly

we just need to get apricot-smudge back to get a super sweet bunny and complete the set

we already have a bunny, a neon green radioactive bunny in fact (biohazardgirl)

I meant things such as background, or what I like. As a woman, I must be straight or full of feminine bias. As a guy, I'm probably anti-feminist, straight, a white knight, etc. I get this from any gender really.

I had a link to a gender guesser once. Basically it would find the ratio of certain words to others (women tend to use more "a" "of" "the"s iirc), but it's probably dependent on American patterns of speech.

Ahhh, ok. Yeah, that's annoying too, fo sho.

[ SECRET POST #2153 ]

Re: f!s, can you indulge me in a rant?

Re: f!s, can you indulge me in a rant?

Re: f!s, can you indulge me in a rant?

Re: f!s, can you indulge me in a rant?

Re: f!s, can you indulge me in a rant?

Re: f!s, can you indulge me in a rant?

Re: f!s, can you indulge me in a rant?