fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2161 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2161 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11.

__________________________________________________

12.

__________________________________________________

13.

__________________________________________________

14.

__________________________________________________

15.

__________________________________________________

16.

__________________________________________________

17.

__________________________________________________

18.

__________________________________________________

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 098 secrets from Secret Submission Post #309.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

I was under the impression (as someone who is very much an amateur wrt linguistics) that the Sapir-Whorf theory is pretty much entirely discredited?

and I don't think that concerns about the words we use are necessarily founded in a belief in something like Sapir-Whorf or linguistic relativity; I think the justification for it is outside that. Although it's certainly possible, and even likely, that it's taken to an extreme and that it's becoming an "increasingly tired for mof language policing."

[ SECRET POST #2161 ]

Re: Sapir Whorf